492
results for "tantek positive"
-
and while we eager work on re-implementing silo features, but for our own sites, I'm just asking that we at least *consider* such social-design impacts, in the hopes that we can, maybe in some small way, built a distributed indie web that is more positive, more humane, than the culture(s) silos have amplified
tantek
at
2013-12-01 00:04
-
so, purely hypothetically speaking, if an opportunity arose to co-chair such a Social Web WG, what do you folks think? would that be something that would be worth my or any of our time to do? do you think we could significantly influence the outcome in an indie-positive way?
tantek
at
2013-11-25 17:00
-
XgF - could you rephrase that in terms of a positive (alternative) ?
tantek
at
2013-11-22 20:30
-
please restate it in a positive way
tantek
at
2013-10-29 16:13
-
more fodder for the "why" page (on the positive side)
tantek
at
2013-09-10 16:00
-
ok danbri let's switch the topic to something more positive then, and we can continue discussions/citations of misbehavior later
tantek
at
2013-08-13 00:33
-
I don't know of any support yet - there's no definitive proof either way until either someone see something working (positive result), or a search engine representative makes an official statement of non-support.
tantek
at
2013-08-12 23:57
-
(since links have implied positive weighting)
tantek
at
2013-08-10 01:53
-
acegiak - right - we've discussed that in the past and haven't come to any positive conclusion regarding subdirectories - since theyr'e not really "owning your own domain"
tantek
at
2013-06-21 08:20
-
Just catching up: congratulations Tantek! That's a really positive piece of news.
benwerd
at
2013-06-04 19:21