498
results for "tantek positive"
-
I don't have an account but I was considering setting one up to POSSE because friends have positive things to say about it.
[tantek]
at
2026-02-08 16:39
-
slight dev rant / accessibility annoyance (so maybe there's a positive suggestion in this) - that article [manton] linked to (via #indieweb-stream) about Bluesky / 🧊 verification has gray text on white and somehow the gray of the text is just light enough to feel "annoying" when trying to read it. So it's not "technically" an accessibility issue (like I can still read it) but it sorta is in that if the design of something (rather than its
[tantek]
at
2026-01-23 20:42
-
Those are good considerations, how much to be anti something that may be harmful vs pro something positive that you're proud of
[tantek]
at
2026-01-20 00:05
-
on a positive note, has anyone explored creating a "cassette futurism" theme / design for their website? like some of the things shown in https://martin-fieber.de/blog/cassette-futurism/ (follow-on from this morning's IndieWebMovieClub zoom)
[tantek]
at
2026-01-11 22:27
-
Gardening is a good positive metaphor
[tantek]
at
2025-12-31 02:56
-
[mattl] I believe there are enough positive use-cases (e.g. helping people block scrapers, providing alternative non-LLM tools) that outweigh the negative of having an explicit channel. we could scope the name accordingly. also I expect more and more new folks showing up will be somewhere between AI-curious and AI-positive, and a channel where whoever is there can help walk through critical discussions may be more welcoming than just
[tantek]
at
2025-08-13 20:35
-
"Wanted to find him people to interact with in town" = nope nope nope. Never had a positive outcome with that sort of intro. Always people looking to vampires for info, jobs, connections, or more reputation collecting. Never hear from them again
[tantek]
at
2025-06-14 20:19
-
ah good, ten top edited pages and top 3 are all positive. newsletter looks good (except for the one non-indieweb indienews post)
[tantek]
at
2025-06-13 21:51
-
like if it wasn't for good faith assumptions about the people involved due to their largely positive reputations, that kind of faffing about corp structures and rebranding looks like a mix of money laundering and/or reputation laundering
[tantek]
at
2025-06-12 16:35
-
3: Be clear about the user-benefits and the service-benefits up front, (positive like user choice, and service independence of silos, and also avoiding negatives like not encouraging users to bind themselves to a silo identity, not having your service drive your users to a silo for identity) rather than "open standards" for open standards sake.
[tantek]
at
2025-06-03 23:27