83
results for "tantek positive"
-
Or to flip it around to a positive, a way to do "free" domains is for governments to grant each person who has an id card (DL, passport) one free domain with some provisos for changing it like you can change your legal name.
[tantek]
at
2026-03-14 18:17
-
slight dev rant / accessibility annoyance (so maybe there's a positive suggestion in this) - that article [manton] linked to (via #indieweb-stream) about Bluesky / 🧊 verification has gray text on white and somehow the gray of the text is just light enough to feel "annoying" when trying to read it. So it's not "technically" an accessibility issue (like I can still read it) but it sorta is in that if the design of something (rather than its
[tantek]
at
2026-01-23 20:42
-
Gardening is a good positive metaphor
[tantek]
at
2025-12-31 02:56
-
"Wanted to find him people to interact with in town" = nope nope nope. Never had a positive outcome with that sort of intro. Always people looking to vampires for info, jobs, connections, or more reputation collecting. Never hear from them again
[tantek]
at
2025-06-14 20:19
-
3: Be clear about the user-benefits and the service-benefits up front, (positive like user choice, and service independence of silos, and also avoiding negatives like not encouraging users to bind themselves to a silo identity, not having your service drive your users to a silo for identity) rather than "open standards" for open standards sake.
[tantek]
at
2025-06-03 23:27
-
hmm, looks like on a Wikipedia page it is picking up a false positive of a link to Help:Contents (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents). I did a view source and found this: <a href="/wiki/Help:Contents" title="Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia"><span>Help</span></a> - is the word "edit" in the title attribute throwing it off?
[tantek]
at
2025-05-24 02:11
-
Nevermind that "not everyone can login" because that's the point. One reason those Web 2.0 sites were primarily positive is that they were dominated by a set of positive optimistic folks with shared values
[tantek]
at
2025-03-18 18:58
-
I’m starting to think one thing one creative / development effort we could do as a community (or even as individuals) would be to rebuild all the primarily positive Web 2.0 "social content" sites except as aggregators with zero accounts, and 100% web sign-in + webmentions to contribute content
[tantek]
at
2025-03-18 18:56
-
carrvo[d], I do believe there is A LOT of positive potential in gamification on personal sites
[tantek]
at
2025-01-08 19:12
-
I do think there is some gamification potential for reinforcing positive behaviors with our own websites
[tantek]
at
2025-01-08 18:58