371
results for "alternate"
-
To me, rel-alternate is an alternate representation of the page, which can be a feed, and rel-feed is a syndicated version of site content, but is not necessarily the same content on that URL. For example, using rel-feed to link to feeds on your home page, which may not actually have your archive view.
GWG
at
2019-07-20 05:02
-
But, since rel-alternate has been adopted for feeds, trying to understand the practical difference.
GWG
at
2019-07-20 05:01
-
Using rel=canonical (or alternate?) might be better
jacky
at
2019-07-01 06:41
-
the rel=alternate is gone, but it's still responding to the accept header
aaronpk
at
2019-06-16 22:00
-
may i suggest taking out the rel=alternate link until that's fixed?
aaronpk
at
2019-06-15 00:02
-
Technically even an atom feed should be `rel="feed"`, not `rel="alternate"`, per the strict reading of what `rel="alternate"` means.
[fluffy]
at
2019-06-05 05:39
-
I guess technically I should be using `rel="alternate feed"` where I’m just using `rel="alternate"` right now, on categories, and `rel="feed"` on entries.
[fluffy]
at
2019-06-05 05:37
-
And I meant this more in the form of how there’s the de-facto (although not technically correct) standard of a blog entry linking to the atom feed for the blog itself on the page. Although that’s not even universal, a lot of things use the permalinks’ rel=alternate to point to a comment feed for the entry itself, for example.
[fluffy]
at
2019-06-05 05:36
-
though I don't think it's really an alternate if it's linking to a full-content version
gRegorLove_
at
2019-06-05 05:34
-
rel-alternate could work. aaronpk has an example on /rel-alternate
gRegorLove_
at
2019-06-05 05:33