507
results for "tantek positive"
-
what we haven’t yet done is to update the definition / intro to be primarily positive. we need a good writer to attempt to integrate and cleverly summarize the most potent of the existing positive why reasons.
tantek
at
2015-07-08 22:37
-
sensiblemn: it can depend on the phase of a movement. in the beginning most movements start as a reaction to some (set of) pain points, and thus a declaration of independence of sorts. only later, when the movement begins to gain its own self-supporting identity does it have enough to describe in primarily positive framing, like a constitution.
tantek
at
2015-07-08 22:35
-
hmm - perhaps with this 5th annual indiewebcamp we can reframe /why as being primarily positive, with a subsection below for avoiding all the negatives, rather than vice versa
tantek
at
2015-07-08 22:26
-
do you want to design for fear (be mostly negative), or do you want to design for empowerment (be mostly positive) ?
tantek
at
2015-06-20 00:41
-
the high level point is this - if a code of conduct is more about negative behaviors than positive bheaviors, then IMO it has the wrong framing, and will likely *hurt* a community in the longterm (provide discouragement/fear to new people)
tantek
at
2015-06-20 00:10
-
as positive examples, I'll point out currently kylewm and acegiak appear to be "able to quickly throw together new features" (which is awesome)
tantek
at
2015-06-18 23:01
-
attempts a positive approach ;)
tantek
at
2015-06-08 22:08
-
anyway, I like snarfed's positive examples - if you can use the to inspire what you build for your site, that's a good thing
tantek
at
2015-05-28 00:42
-
positive examples are useful
tantek
at
2015-05-28 00:28
-
haven't bothered to write-up a big rant blog post about that because there's too many positive blog posts in my queue to get to ;)
tantek
at
2015-05-28 00:25