505 results for "tantek positive"

  • aaronpk, another option to consider is subsetting your article on the more microformats positive aspects and maybe editing out the critiques of google / schema etc., noting that the full research / details are available on your site for anyone that wants them
    tantek at 2017-06-19 21:04
  • or rather, it feels like segregation rather than a positive thing. maybe I'm overreacting but it makes me uncomfortable
    tantek at 2017-06-06 02:18
  • GWG, it goes reasonably well. Good Sunday so far. posted something positive to my site which is always a plus (and a good way to start the day)
    tantek at 2017-06-05 03:40
  • strugee: tantek left you a message 3 days, 23 hours ago: looks like you found your answer re: Google and microformats? They definitely still do parse microformats, question is where they are with parsing mf2, since they have unofficially made positive remarks about it for a few years, and may just be waiting for some measure of critical mass (which has accelerated in the past 2 years)
    Loqi at 2017-05-23 15:12
  • !tell strugee looks like you found your answer re: Google and microformats? They definitely still do parse microformats, question is where they are with parsing mf2, since they have unofficially made positive remarks about it for a few years, and may just be waiting for some measure of critical mass (which has accelerated in the past 2 years)
    tantek at 2017-05-19 16:00
  • tantek: i think if we can craft the message I think we will mostly see positive response from the AC
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2017-05-16 15:17
  • alright in searching Twitter for ActivityPub it looks mostly positive statements so not much to worry about
    tantek at 2017-05-10 22:01
  • pointed out I don't post too often, and that I post generally positive things, sent them to my # 100DoPP as an example
    tantek at 2017-05-10 17:53
  • tantek: the more positive notes we can get the better. but at least we have no objections
    cwebber at 2017-05-09 15:15
  • tantek: to put it in a positive way, as long as we make normative changes we need to issue new CRs for or are updating the test suite, then we probably need to meet every week
    cwebber at 2017-05-09 15:08
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23