505
results for "tantek positive"
-
and it took a bit of back/forth in-person discussion to get to a positive self-framing instead of the "non-developer" self-labeling
tantek
at
2017-07-25 18:34
-
So both gen1 folks need to explicitly use positive framing (instead of "non-x" wording), but gen1 folks also need to encourage gen2+ folks to explicitly use positive self-framing, and perhaps even explicitly discourage "non-x" self-framing.
tantek
at
2017-07-25 18:34
-
it helps to prefer positive framing terms (as on the /generations page) instead of phrases like "non-dev" :)
tantek
at
2017-07-25 18:31
-
I'm pretty sure it's a good idea but I want to get at least *some* positive feedback before I go ahead and make all the changes, do all the documentation etc.
tantek
at
2017-07-21 21:05
-
"feed readers" haven't yet caught up to that kind of positive ecosystem interaction
tantek
at
2017-07-21 18:51
-
sandro++ for seeing the positive. thank you
tantek
at
2017-07-18 17:53
-
yes, that's a good positive assumption
tantek
at
2017-07-17 06:39
-
(reframed as a positive as opposed to on /https :) )
tantek
at
2017-07-14 23:14
-
tantek: To focus on the positive use case cwebber2 expressed of Mastodon folks self-marking posts, as to how folks would expect that to work in a federated system, when the systems have a very different cultures and backgrounds.
sandro
at
2017-06-27 17:43
-
... tantek tried 100 days of positive posts
gRegorLove
at
2017-06-24 17:40