480
results for "tantek positive"
-
miklb, sebsel, if you wanted to experiment with doing that in your cities, I'd say go for it, and see how your local community reacts. if it makes a positive difference (increasing # of participants), then keep it.
tantek
at
2017-09-22 00:37
-
to reframe that as a positive, what extra information do you want to provide beyond what (you presume) everyone wants to see on your home page, and why?
tantek
at
2017-09-13 18:30
-
jjuran++ in particular for positive counter-examples with citations!
tantek
at
2017-09-12 00:37
-
self framing is part of the overall need for more positive framing, and use of explicit positive (re)framing to counteract default negative framing
tantek
at
2017-07-25 22:18
-
what is positive framing?
tantek
at
2017-07-25 22:10
-
and it took a bit of back/forth in-person discussion to get to a positive self-framing instead of the "non-developer" self-labeling
tantek
at
2017-07-25 20:34
-
So both gen1 folks need to explicitly use positive framing (instead of "non-x" wording), but gen1 folks also need to encourage gen2+ folks to explicitly use positive self-framing, and perhaps even explicitly discourage "non-x" self-framing.
tantek
at
2017-07-25 20:34
-
it helps to prefer positive framing terms (as on the /generations page) instead of phrases like "non-dev" :)
tantek
at
2017-07-25 20:31
-
I'm pretty sure it's a good idea but I want to get at least *some* positive feedback before I go ahead and make all the changes, do all the documentation etc.
tantek
at
2017-07-21 23:05
-
"feed readers" haven't yet caught up to that kind of positive ecosystem interaction
tantek
at
2017-07-21 20:51