480
results for "tantek positive"
-
[jgmac1106], others, for your consideration for today's IndieWeb Challenge: http://tantek.com/2018/357/t3/five-reasons-post-positive-things-promptly
[tantek]
at
2018-12-24 09:00
-
maybe I'll post reasons to post positive things promptly as hopefully a reference to encourage folks who don't post often to post more often
[tantek]
at
2018-12-24 07:38
-
5. the sooner you can post about positive things that you personally observed or especially participated in (actions, events, accomplishments), the more details you will remember, and the more you reinforce your own short-term (then longterm) memory of the thing! Since that value decreases as the time since the thing happened increases, post the about the most recent thing first to get the details down, the the next most recent thing etc.
[tantek]
at
2018-12-17 23:22
-
[[tantek]] brainstorm while away: a few good reasons to promptly post about positive things - looking for feedback (before I post / wiki these as brainstorms)
Loqi
at
2018-12-17 23:18
-
4. get ahead of future negative press/circumstances - get your positive post published and out there before something bad happens in the future that you'll either have to deal with instead, or will make provide a bad/poor temporal context for your otherwise positive post.
[tantek]
at
2018-12-15 21:20
-
3. sooner domino/compounding effect - the sooner you post something positive, the sooner others may see and be inspired by your example to do positive things, and inspire others etc.;
[tantek]
at
2018-12-15 21:20
-
1. positive self-affirmation to reinforce positive behaviors/habits more strongly after having finished something;
[tantek]
at
2018-12-15 21:20
-
brainstorm while away: a few good reasons to promptly post about positive things - looking for feedback (before I post / wiki these as brainstorms)
[tantek]
at
2018-12-15 21:19
-
From the dfn sounds more like a competition - perhaps consider renaming / reframing as more of a positive?
[tantek]
at
2018-12-01 22:03
-
[jgmac1106] I noticed in your edit to /welcoming that you kept the 1 "male" 1 "female" name distribution, whether intentionally or not. I'm wondering if there's perhaps a positive step to be taken by using all "female" names when there are 2-3 folks interacting for a protocol. A protocol Bechdel's test of sorts. In addition, for any diminutive/introductory/teaching usage (e.g. welcome new person), I'm wondering if it would be better to use a m
[tantek]
at
2018-11-29 20:16