505
results for "tantek positive"
-
another example: since a key point of POSSEing is distribution and /reach, at least in a positive way to friends who may still be "stuck" on the silo destination, front-loading things like hashtags and @-mentions in that first 256chars makes a lot of sense
[tantek]4
at
2022-10-04 20:15
-
I have a feeling some of the original intent behind the expression/concept of "proof of work" implied proof of *productive* or *useful* or at least some sort of *net positive* work and that was clearly lost at some point
[tantek]4
at
2022-09-12 22:28
-
[schmarty] on a positive note, I'm definitely curious what subset of "some markdown" you "use the heck out of"
[tantek]
at
2022-08-16 00:04
-
I really dislike the idea of a TOS for indieweb sites as it seems like a bad adoption of something very corporate and very legalese framed, instead of something actually independent and frankly community positive.
[tantek]
at
2022-08-08 06:00
-
Another positive thing from this article is that the combination of IndieWebify.me and the [IndieMark] "Levels" helped provide a roadmap of sorts that gave a relatively direct path to follow, a sense of achievement ("*Level 2 IndieWeb citizen*"), and a clear idea of next steps: "What I’m currently missing is a way of having IndieWeb conversations (IndieWeb level 3, according to IndieWebify.me)"
[tantek]
at
2022-08-03 16:31
-
campegg, sorta. The whole "the metaverse was a cautionary Torment Nexus tale" is a bit of a retcon. At the time (1992), the web was just a random prototype hack, and the internet was only used (primarily) by text nerds (myself included). At the time (again, 1992), the "metaverse" was seen as a more accessible view of the internet that would be much easier (UX) for lots of people to use, i.e. a positive thing
[tantek]
at
2022-07-28 19:58
-
standards++ are more of a #indieweb-dev thing, though this will impact lots of folks here (hopefully in a positive way) https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/07/tech/europe-uscb-requirement/index.html — will follow-up with #indieweb-dev specific questions/potential there
[tantek]
at
2022-06-07 17:21
-
it's not spam, it's merely a false positive. there is a difference
[tantek]
at
2022-05-24 17:08
-
I would ask them if they could reframe “not be always online” as a positive condition instead
[tantek]
at
2022-04-15 20:11
-
indeed that message from jay made me more optimistic. agreed snarfed about [benatwork]’s tweet being a bit generous, however I wonder if that kind of public generosity also helps as a form of positive inclusion nudging. maybe that's a good way to build bridges from a social perspective?
[tantek]
at
2022-03-19 19:13