98
results for "javascript need"
-
I do that kind of stuff server-side with CGI so browsers don't need to know how javascript works, but that won't work on neocities...
epoch
at
2024-08-26 23:12
-
deleted /User:Ingoogni.nl "content was: " Trying to layout a set up that creates a server that does many things that browser plug-ins do. Fed up with plug-ins since mozilla/firefox not only killed the rss reader (that I didn't care fore) but also discovery. Now I need a plug-in that tries to subscribe me to some service I'm not interested in. The idea is to inject a bit of html/css/javascript with an ove...", and the only contributor was "[[Special:Contributions/Ingoogni.nl|Ingoogni.nl]]" ([[User talk:Ingoogni.nl|talk]])"
Loqi
at
2024-05-07 19:06
-
Yep! I love it now that it’s going but just a heads up that you definitely need to be comfortable with javascript.
[Al_Abut]
at
2024-05-01 17:44
-
collections are a win in my book. The popularity of javascript solutions to masonry layout over time is a good indicator of need. I've not posted a blog post in support but was considering it if life eases up and I'm not past whatever deadline there is.
[Joe_Crawford]
at
2024-04-24 18:14
-
capjamesg is python code readily runnable in a Browser Add-on? Or would the code need to be translated to Javascript
[tantek]
at
2024-04-13 02:53
-
[indienews] New post: https://www.htmhell.dev/adventcalendar/2023/2/ (from https://snarfed.org/2023-12-02_you-dont-need-javascript-for-that-htmhell)
Loqi
at
2023-12-02 21:34
-
[preview] [Tantek Çelik] js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. Pages that are empty without JS: dead to history (archive-org), unreliable for search results (despite any search engine claims of JS support, check it yourself), and thus ignorable. No need to waste time ...
Loqi
at
2023-10-19 19:02
-
[preview] [Tantek Çelik] js;dr = JavaScript required; Didn’t Read. Pages that are empty without JS: dead to history (archive-org), unreliable for search results (despite any search engine claims of JS support, check it yourself), and thus ignorable. No need to waste time ...
Loqi
at
2023-10-19 19:02
-
I didn't check "negative" for jquery. I only *thought* about it because I don't think I'll ever use it again, but that's because, as [KevinMarks] said, it got written into javascript. So I no longer need it.
btrem
at
2023-09-22 23:34
-
Neither do you need a banner to use JavaScript. But also, complaining about images not showing after having installed a special extension and then asking for plain text restaurant sites (I guess this means without containing images?) sounds a bit odd.
bkil
at
2023-04-24 15:55