500
results for "tantek positive"
-
tantek jgmac1106 super interesting conversation about following! No time for it now, but I’d love to continue this discussion more and see if we can take those lessons and move that forward in a positive direction. I’d love to see how Indigenous for iOS might be able to help move that “following” people goal forward (although that might require buy in from Aperture too, haha!)
[eddie]
at
2018-11-17 04:27
-
Exactly cjw6k, it's awkward messy unobvious stuff that if we were to help with even minimal guidelines, it would helps set more positive defaults, so that at least folks that want to do the right thing but aren't sure how would have some guidance they could use.
[tantek]
at
2020-07-01 19:25
-
TBH IG is going to be hard for me, I get a lot of positive interactions there with keeping up with people that I don't see on Twitter or IndieWeb. I also see a much warmer, kinder, and more vulnerable side of folks on IG too. It's so different from Twitter. I did take a break from posting there, about 3 months now.
[tantek]
at
2020-09-15 00:57
-
tantek: throwing in some thoughts on "scratch your own itch". I really like the duality of "cook what you eat"/"eat what you cook"; I think it's positive that the principles are clearly linked together. That said, I generally prefer "make what you want" (or similar literal variations) as it feels more obvious and less jargon-like. I'd personally prefer something like "make what you want"/"use what you make" to 'replace' those two principle
Murray[d]
at
2021-10-20 08:45
-
capjamesg, RSS+enclosures was "good enough" and "simple enough" for folks to prototype and get a positive feedback loop of publishers & consuming apps working and enough "early adopter" / "power user" adoption to be the "obvious" choice of an ecosystem to support/supplant when Apple decided to get into podcasting
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 20:06
-
^ we have that for some guidance for good approaches to bringing people into the community in a positive way. Could further discuss such approaches in #indieweb-meta as well since it's community related rather than explicitly about our personal sites. My original question was about the personal publishing practice of POSSEing to Twitter, like remaining good use-cases which still makes sense to discuss here
[tantek]
at
2024-11-04 18:28
-
hmm, looks like on a Wikipedia page it is picking up a false positive of a link to Help:Contents (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents). I did a view source and found this: <a href="/wiki/Help:Contents" title="Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia"><span>Help</span></a> - is the word "edit" in the title attribute throwing it off?
[tantek]
at
2025-05-24 02:11
-
3: Be clear about the user-benefits and the service-benefits up front, (positive like user choice, and service independence of silos, and also avoiding negatives like not encouraging users to bind themselves to a silo identity, not having your service drive your users to a silo for identity) rather than "open standards" for open standards sake.
[tantek]
at
2025-06-03 23:27
-
tantek meant to say: to put it in a more positive light, it makes more sense for us (indieweb) to focus on designing/implementing the simplest possible technologies directly necessary for our use-cases, and not worry about more complex approaches (or who claims to use them), except as prior art research (to avoid repeating mistakes).
Loqi
at
2014-01-25 00:41
-
shaners, great. Also I'd like to take this opportunity to challeng you to come up with a *positive* framing/focus for a homepage redesign, rather than avoiding/improving on "still too overwhelming". "make it responsive" is a good start, but we could do that with existing content. As you said, we can do better. :)
tantek
at
2016-05-12 22:39