34
results for "tantek positive"
-
KevinMarks, maybe? I don't think such negative signals actually work in practice. I think the opposite is true. We need some consuming code/service incentive to publish more "positive" explicitly social "links" (like the meanings conveyed by XFN) which many things (including search engines, but not primarily) could use to prioritize results both overall, and based on who is searching (if you've chosen to login)
[tantek]
at
2021-04-15 19:04
-
Frankly I'm not a huge fan of the Change Proposal process, and I'd rather focus my energies on positive contributions (e.g. the wiki contributions to microformats to help it work better as a registry) than to fight about objections.
tantek
at
2011-04-02 02:43
-
[tantek] Restating for clarity, and adding children as another way to stop implying p-name "p-name MUST NOT be implied if there are any explicit p-* properties or any nested microformats" Need consensus positive feedback from parser developers and one p...
Loqi
at
2018-01-05 19:48
-
I don't know of any support yet - there's no definitive proof either way until either someone see something working (positive result), or a search engine representative makes an official statement of non-support.
tantek
at
2013-08-12 23:57