94
results for "tantek positive"
-
indeed that message from jay made me more optimistic. agreed snarfed about [benatwork]’s tweet being a bit generous, however I wonder if that kind of public generosity also helps as a form of positive inclusion nudging. maybe that's a good way to build bridges from a social perspective?
[tantek]
at
2022-03-19 19:13
-
We had 1 report of a Covid positive test a few days after IWC, and a few confirmations of negative tests. Anyone else who participated in person have any symptoms or want to report anything else? Otherwise am going to document it as 1 case reported and leave it at that awaiting more information.
[tantek]
at
2023-11-02 16:58
-
tantek: throwing in some thoughts on "scratch your own itch". I really like the duality of "cook what you eat"/"eat what you cook"; I think it's positive that the principles are clearly linked together. That said, I generally prefer "make what you want" (or similar literal variations) as it feels more obvious and less jargon-like. I'd personally prefer something like "make what you want"/"use what you make" to 'replace' those two principle
Murray[d]
at
2021-10-20 08:45
-
[jgmac1106] I noticed in your edit to /welcoming that you kept the 1 "male" 1 "female" name distribution, whether intentionally or not. I'm wondering if there's perhaps a positive step to be taken by using all "female" names when there are 2-3 folks interacting for a protocol. A protocol Bechdel's test of sorts. In addition, for any diminutive/introductory/teaching usage (e.g. welcome new person), I'm wondering if it would be better to use a m
[tantek]
at
2018-11-29 19:16