268
results for "tantek positive"
-
I really dislike the idea of a TOS for indieweb sites as it seems like a bad adoption of something very corporate and very legalese framed, instead of something actually independent and frankly community positive.
[tantek]
at
2022-08-08 08:00
-
re: "social norm to not talk about it" — rather among Slack instances/channels I'm in, there is a positive encouragement to stay focused on specific topics, that way everyone can choose if they want to read/chat about that topic or not. There are plenty of channels in plenty of Slacks/discords I know of with "politics" or related channels. So I don't share that experience of "no persons land". Rather, I think in a very positive way, communitie
[tantek]
at
2024-10-16 22:45
-
so, purely hypothetically speaking, if an opportunity arose to co-chair such a Social Web WG, what do you folks think? would that be something that would be worth my or any of our time to do? do you think we could significantly influence the outcome in an indie-positive way?
tantek
at
2013-11-25 17:00
-
and while we eager work on re-implementing silo features, but for our own sites, I'm just asking that we at least *consider* such social-design impacts, in the hopes that we can, maybe in some small way, built a distributed indie web that is more positive, more humane, than the culture(s) silos have amplified
tantek
at
2013-12-01 00:04
-
to put it in a more positive light, it makes more sense for us (indieweb) to focus on designing/implementing the simplest possible technologies directly necessary for our use-cases, and not worry about more complex approaches (or who claims to use them), except as priori art research (to avoid repeating mistakes).
tantek
at
2014-01-25 01:40
-
[KevinMarks] I found this article much more compelling than Anil's (wtf do alt app stores have to do with the web? zero), with much clearer positive advantages discussed, as well as clear pathways to get on the open / indie web: https://rknight.me/blog/the-web-is-fantastic/
[tantek]
at
2023-12-30 22:51
-
Anecdotally I have seen this to be true also: "users that click attend on all Facebook event invites just so they can remember the event for later or provide positive feedback to the person who invited them (similar to a “like" button). When someone doesn’t buy a ticket, they won’t have any skin in the game and can afford to miss the event."
tantek
at
2015-09-25 22:55
-
tantek meant to say: to put it in a more positive light, it makes more sense for us (indieweb) to focus on designing/implementing the simplest possible technologies directly necessary for our use-cases, and not worry about more complex approaches (or who claims to use them), except as prior art research (to avoid repeating mistakes).
Loqi
at
2014-01-25 01:41
-
shaners, great. Also I'd like to take this opportunity to challeng you to come up with a *positive* framing/focus for a homepage redesign, rather than avoiding/improving on "still too overwhelming". "make it responsive" is a good start, but we could do that with existing content. As you said, we can do better. :)
tantek
at
2016-05-13 00:39
-
[tantek] not sure what "aggregate share behaviours" means 😅 Perhaps this is another "cultural" difference though. I'd say well over half, if not over three-quarters, of things shared to any of my various timelines are from people saying "hey, this is cool, check it out!". The rest are normally instances of people saying "hey, this is problematic, don't do this/here's what's wrong", so it's definitely not 100% positive, but certainly majority
[Murray]
at
2024-03-20 10:44