80 results for "tantek positive"

  • On the positive side of technology re-use, folks here may be interested in this (and feel free to contribute how-to suggestions) https://github.com/chrisdavidmills/mdn-and-frameworks/issues/1
    [tantek] at 2019-05-30 18:41
  • ancarda, as a positive step forward, take a look at what a bunch of us are using our User: pages for on the IndieWeb wiki for tracking our "Working On" and "Itches" etc.
    tantek at 2017-11-16 16:13
  • My experience in web standards / collaboration is that's the most efficient (least community labor) way to help sustain a more positive community. See the reading / citations here for more: https://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists#Why_to_avoid_negative_behaviors
    [tantek] at 2023-03-29 14:52
  • Though it was also the turnaround point so perhaps that's a positive. 2009 was indieweb rockbottom for me. And also when I started coding /Falcon, with an intent to go 100% back to owning my own notes on 2010-01-01, which I did, even if it took me 25 days to get POSSEing working 🙂
    [tantek] at 2019-10-11 10:28
  • Web We Found was a talk and presentation by {{kevinmarks]] at Le Web 2013 that summarized the start of various positive trends and patterns from 2003 onward, like blogging, building on open protocols, which have grown since, many incorporated into the IndieWeb, and provides hopeful counterpoint to [[The Web We Lost]].
    [tantek] at 2020-03-30 00:04
  • in my unending quest of brainstorming webmention filtering / ordering, since so much of the backlog is from Twitter, I'm considering another algorithm/heuristic of a "positive" signal. if a tweet reply is from an account that rel=me validates with an IndieWeb site, then that's more "real" than other twitter accounts
    [tantek] at 2020-07-16 21:37
  • Another positive thing from this article is that the combination of IndieWebify.me and the [IndieMark] "Levels" helped provide a roadmap of sorts that gave a relatively direct path to follow, a sense of achievement ("*Level 2 IndieWeb citizen*"), and a clear idea of next steps: "What I’m currently missing is a way of having IndieWeb conversations (IndieWeb level 3, according to IndieWebify.me)"
    [tantek] at 2022-08-03 18:31
  • note to self and [snarfed] and whoever shows up to SocialCG meetings, please remember to speak up during "Community Announcements" and announce any/all upcoming events, HWC, IWC, pop-ups and be welcoming, inviting, inclusive of everyone in the CG call. It's definitely an aligned enough group and subset of the SocialCG that I see positive cross-pollination opportunities
    [tantek] at 2024-05-03 23:24
  • I mean sure, there's a lot of design aspects of Twitter that likely contribute to its problematic nature. I'm not sure that "realtime" is essentially the cause of those problems though maybe it may amplify some of them? In other contexts (e.g. chat like here, or GitHub comments showing up on an issue while you're looking at it), real time is quite positive
    [tantek] at 2021-10-13 21:40
  • I’m starting to think one thing one creative / development effort we could do as a community (or even as individuals) would be to rebuild all the primarily positive Web 2.0 "social content" sites except as aggregators with zero accounts, and 100% web sign-in + webmentions to contribute content
    [tantek] at 2025-03-18 19:56
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23