24 results for "microformats hard"

  • microformats are a bit too hard on the consuming side >_<
    myfreeweb at 2016-03-22 13:51
  • @kevinmarks marvelous! #indieweb bonus! have had to explain microformats > schema too many times to remember. html classes are hard! ;)
    Loqi at 2016-01-08 02:55
  • cosuming microformats is hard!
    KartikPrabhu at 2015-07-18 03:49
  • i think it will be hard to make a sensible micropub request unless we have a good microformats representation of that kind of tag
    aaronpk at 2015-03-30 16:19
  • when I consume microformats I do so from the parsed object, so it's kind of hard to find the "first h-feed" because it may be a child of any object at any depth
    aaronpk at 2014-12-31 21:11
  • I agree html is hard to parse, that's why we have microformats!
    aaronpk at 2014-12-08 19:26
  • honestly the most fun with indieweb I have because I can work on my own software and can use open source stuff for the hard parts (like the microformats parser, or posting to facebook/twitter)
    Jeena at 2014-06-19 22:45
  • here is my argument "If I can write code to parse microformats after only about 6 months of learnin python, HTML parsing can't be that hard"
    KartikPrabhu at 2014-05-07 01:01
  • albeit a practical die-hard semweb masochist freak. that's why I publish microformats too.
    tommorris at 2013-08-10 12:33
  • got the hard parts done - nested microformats, <base>/relative URIs
    tommorris at 2013-06-22 13:40
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23