383886 results for ""a""

  • The part of the public square analogy that breaks down to me is you can see whether you’re attracting a crowd and what you’re saying is resonating, or if you’re being completely ignored, or something in between where a handful get curious.
    [Al_Abut] at 2025-11-09 19:39
  • Even in that Speaker’s Corner analogy, there’s perhaps an analog. Publishing a public blog is like walking down to Speaker’s Corner, stepping up onto a soapbox, and speaking your mind. Adding a feed file is like that except with a bullhorn. They are materially different with different likely outcomes
    [tantek] at 2025-11-09 19:38
  • It’s important to me to put it out there because I love being a consumer of RSS so much, and I know it’s private by default so I have no comments or interactions or tracking or anything, but that’s also part of what makes it a bit of a feeling like I’m shouting into the void sometimes.
    [Al_Abut] at 2025-11-09 19:37
  • publics are the combined set of people who make up the readership or audience of a post https://indieweb.org/publics
    Loqi at 2025-11-09 19:35
  • Efficiencies and enabling more automation (which feed files can do, given current consuming code support) IMO absolutely produces a user-relevant material difference
    [tantek] at 2025-11-09 19:33
  • i deploy it on the website and send it(is still a prototype so i don't have bouight a domain and a hosting)
    scimmiarancia at 2025-11-09 17:40
  • Publishing a public website is in a very real sense like walking down to Speaker's Corner in London and talking on a bullhorn. An RSS feed automates it, but it's not materially different. It's an affirmative publishing act either way. _"Perhaps I am overthinking this"_ muses the author: to which I say, sure, but it's beautiful to be so vulnerable and to think out loud in public.
    [artlung] at 2025-11-09 17:38
  • Don’t worry about “categorizing” them in any kind of hierarchy or other subnav structure. Ignore, procrastinate any such kind of “meta” thinking/work and focus on the writing/content instead. Too many people spend too much time up front about setting up a “system” before getting to the point, which is writing & publishing the actual content.
    [tantek] at 2025-11-09 17:19
  • I would say it depends. Also, whatever you decide will be fine. For me, I would keep sections to a minimum, unless they each have a lot of distinct content, then it makes sense to "categorise" them – you can do that as a separate section OR a category of (blog) post.
    [Trevor_Morris] at 2025-11-09 17:11
  • what to post is a collection of ideas, suggestions, and examples of things to post your personal site or blog https://indieweb.org/what_to_post
    Loqi at 2025-11-09 17:10
Sort by:
Relevance Date


Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.05s.

Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23
Powered by phinde, the self-hosted search engine. status