""a"" search results - search chat.indieweb.org

377879 results for ""a""

because a lot of this can be automatically checked to see if the right rel values are being used or not
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:29
capjamesg, this makes me think we need to start thinking about a rel value validator, perhaps an addition to http://indiewebify.me
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:28
hmm, maybe a PDF with a hyperlink to itself in a repo could have rel="repository"?
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:27
and in all those cases, since none of those files can have a hyperlink *inside*, the rel value must be conveyed by HTTP LINK header
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:23
So you may use rel=repository on its own if a file is say markdown or txt but not code?
capjamesg at 2025-05-28 19:21
quoting from https://microformats.org/wiki/source-code-brainstorming#Alternatives "rel=repository. … for just the (presumably revision control) repository file for the current page, without asserting a 'code' semantic"
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:20
re: "differs from a source-code file" – examples of plain "view source code" (not on a repo): wikis that require login to edit instead show a "View source" link/button that when clicked shows you a textarea you can copy out of (but not edit). E.g. http://indieweb.org, http://microformats.org/wiki, http://wiki.mozilla.org
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:19
those are all the examples where a page on the web links directly to the file in github
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:17
(and how it differs from a source-code file)
capjamesg at 2025-05-28 19:06
nope, if your link means "root" of a repository, then you must use both: rel="repository root"
[tantek] at 2025-05-28 19:02

Sort by:

Relevance Date

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.05s.

Search tips

Exclusion: +foo -bar
Logical OR: foo OR bar
Exact phrase: "foo bar"
Partial words: foo*
Particular fields only: title:foo; domain:example.org; nick:somebody; after:2016-11-23; before:2016-11-23; date:2016-11-23