""a"" search results - search chat.indieweb.org

369803 results for ""a""

Does lynx support a media type or media selector for its "text only" mode that I could target with an @media rule and then add some generated text to any iframes that help lynx users decide to view them or not?
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 20:25
All questions about the IndieWeb are welcome here; we can answer directly, or point you to a wiki page / area on the wiki that may answer your question or fuel your curiosity.
capjamesg[d] at 2024-11-02 18:59
blockhead No worries at all! The wiki is a wide place, and it is often hard to find exactly what you are looking for as you get started!
capjamesg[d] at 2024-11-02 18:58
The wiki is a great resource -- also if you find chat hard to use the weekly HWC Zooms are a great spot to dip in and have conversations about all the steps of having a website https://events.indieweb.org/tag/hwc
[Joe_Crawford] at 2024-11-02 18:49
is experiencing confusion about the indieweb. After browsing the site (and not finding the link to the FAQ (I'm sure it's there, I just apparently can't find it)) I have all of my questions distilled down to a single yes/no question which will probably answer or forstall any further questions. Here goes: does Indieweb provide web hosting?
blockhead at 2024-11-02 18:35
Another "embed" use-case, could I display an embed of someone else's post above my reply to that post, as a "simple"/minimal reply-context?
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 17:45
E.g. I’m wondering if "embedding" someone's reply to one of my notes at the end of the note would be sufficient to show it as a "comment", and if not, what would be missing or what would need changing?
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 17:44
Maybe borderline #indieweb-dev, however the use-case feels worth mentioning here first: I am wondering if "embeds" have other interesting/useful use-cases beyond dropping in an embed like a quote inside an otherwise longer article/note
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 17:43
[snarfed] separately, similar to your recent #microformats question, is there a way to markup part of a post so BF does NOT include it in the content sent to AP/fedi? E.g. I could "just" use markup ignored by Mastodon (e.g. iframes) for such "don't federate this part" content, however wondering if you've implemented a -bf- property for BF to ignore inside
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 17:42
This is a web->wm->BF->AP/fedi use-case in particular and thus I think worth its own issue bc I believe it's simpler than the AT-AP bridging scenario
[tantek] at 2024-11-02 17:39

Sort by:

Relevance Date

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.04s.

Search tips

Exclusion: +foo -bar
Logical OR: foo OR bar
Exact phrase: "foo bar"
Partial words: foo*
Particular fields only: title:foo; domain:example.org; nick:somebody; after:2016-11-23; before:2016-11-23; date:2016-11-23