375752
results for ""a""
-
No I'm saying your argument is actually flawed, but if you choose to interpret it as a mischaracterization, then I'm saying consider that you're doing the same thing to stpeter's post.
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:36
-
in response to statements like "men suck." the common retort is "not all men." which is demonstrably a flawed response. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NotAllMen
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:32
-
you're basically making a "Not all news [men]." argument which is also flawed
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:30
-
absence of what you'd like to see is not a valid criticism for throwing out everything else the author is saying
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:29
-
a more direct intepretation of "things that people in power think I should care about" would be "algorithmic feeds bad"
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:26
-
that's quite a stretch to extrapolate from "news bad" to "web bad". my point is, by directly interpreting his words, you get a very IndieWeb-aligned perspective. no need for circuitous multi-steps analogies
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:26
-
[tantek]: not a strawman argument. I was making an analogy. He says the solution to poisonous news sources is to avoid the news. I think that's wrong, for the reason that I mentioned. Namely, that the mass media is, more or less by definition, corporate media. The solution is to make or support alternative, independent, news media.
btrem
at
2025-03-26 03:24
-
however, nothing in stpeter's post says "stay away from web" — not sure where you got that from, feels like a strawman?
[tantek]
at
2025-03-26 03:03
-
GWG, that would be great. Maybe tell me in a few days.
Kolev
at
2025-03-26 01:59
-
GWG, can you recommend a plugin for use with Borg?
Kolev
at
2025-03-26 00:42
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.03s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23