10470
results for "test"
-
User:Gregorlove.com << {{gRegor}} test
gRegor
at
2025-05-30 01:09
-
ok, I added "{{gRegor}} test" to the "See Also" section of /User:Gregorlove.com https://indieweb.org/wiki/index.php?diff=101862&oldid=93553
Loqi
at
2025-05-30 01:09
-
I am writing a plain JavaScript file I'd like to test.
capjamesg
at
2025-05-29 23:17
-
I recall it being pretty easy, though it was years ago. Hopefully it still worked. I'm trying to remember the feedburner URL for my feed to test it haha
gRegor
at
2025-05-29 22:21
-
so somehow I've made it so I can't "just" shift-reload my CSS to "force" a reload from my server, I suspect because Cloudflare is cachine it but not sure how to confirm / test
[tantek]
at
2025-05-29 04:19
-
If someone needs a test case, I could deploy a dev version of my intercom with a test user.
perryflynn
at
2025-05-28 08:46
-
when I tried to the obvious "workaround" to do the null needle test in my code before calling strpos, that resulted in some other unobvious hang
[tantek]
at
2025-05-27 20:52
-
[tantek]: add me in this block list xD. I'm just put main page to rel=edit just for test
doesnm
at
2025-05-24 18:48
-
Ok will test it some more later today when I get the update
[tantek]
at
2025-05-24 18:43
-
basically if a spec lacks a test suite or implementation report I treat it like a W3C CR — good idea/consensus in theory, but yet to be proven to be implementable or interoperable or even of interest to implementers (per feature). that's part of the value (difference) of between CR and REC. less so in the past, but certainly I'd say 90 (95?)%+ of W3C RECs in the past 10y have all had to have test suites, implementations that pass them, and
[tantek]
at
2025-05-24 01:39
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.01s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23