17941
results for "bridgy"
-
I'm fine for it to still link to the Bridgy extension until if/when I turn it down
[snarfed]
at
2023-12-26 19:29
-
should https://indieweb.org/browser_extension link directly to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bridgy/ (instead of your blog post) ?
[tantek]
at
2023-12-26 19:27
-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bridgy/ ? that's "the extension" too, right?
[snarfed]
at
2023-12-26 19:26
-
I'll point out that the Bridgy IG add-on is still listed, so it's not something protocol related AFAIK: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bridgy/
[tantek]
at
2023-12-26 18:10
-
Bridgy isn't finding an h-feed or top-level h-entry's on your home page, so it's not able to find either synd links or links to the individual post pages. https://brid.gy/about#link
[snarfed]
at
2023-12-24 02:38
-
[snarfed] This is kid of an edge case, but I think Bridgy might get confused if there are links in a Bluesky post that aren’t the canonical link for the post. For example, this post has two inline links elsewhere — https://bsky.app/profile/manton.org/post/3kh62nbtbw72b — so Bridgy just tries to discover a Webmention endpoint for the first one, instead of trying to send the mention back to my blog. (Do I have this right?)
[manton]
at
2023-12-23 17:46
-
[snarfed] Does Bridgy accept at:// URLs for u-syndication when matching up a blog post to its Bluesky post, or does it need to be https://? I should probably switch to web links but wanted to do some testing with what I already have.
[manton]
at
2023-12-23 01:08
-
That makes sense. I was wondering how the current bridgy vs bridgy-fed selector will fit into the redesign.
[aciccarello]
at
2023-12-22 21:17
-
right. https://20231222t115127-dot-bridgy-federated.uc.r.appspot.com/ is my current first draft
[snarfed]
at
2023-12-22 21:17
-
testing out a Bridgy Fed home page redesign for multiple protocols. feedback is welcome! https://20231222t115127-dot-bridgy-federated.uc.r.appspot.com/
[snarfed]
at
2023-12-22 20:55