10683
results for "test"
-
Looks like my attempt to add a test was not appropriately done. Will have to find more time for this, sorry.
carrvo
at
2026-03-14 20:41
-
For https://github.com/microformats/microformats-parser/pull/457? I saw it was awaiting approval to run the test suites, so I just clicked that and running now.
gRegor
at
2026-03-13 22:20
-
Demoed the different pasting in https://etherpad.indieweb.org/test
gRegor
at
2026-03-12 22:32
-
Incidentally this is something that is now caught by the test suite.
jkingweb
at
2026-03-06 22:14
-
me personally? i am not sure what i wish to advocate for, although as you say a test suite probably can't hurt, unless it's testing for the wrong things. so having a processing model for activities is probably needed, but if people just ignore activities entirely then they'll ignore that too.
trwnh
at
2026-03-05 20:37
-
Perhaps I'm an optimist then? I don't think we should give up on the spec being the spec. I believe that if a good faith AP/AS2 test suite effort were developed in the new Social Web WG, that Mastodon would both contribute to it, and be open to making changes (fixes) as a result of the test suite exposing bugs (according to the spec).
[tantek]
at
2026-03-05 20:20
-
"asking for jsonld faith" is a strawman but at this point the test suite is basically mastodon. i'm really not sure at all how jsonld could ever be "required" because you already end up assuming the context from the application/activity+json content type (which is where the semantics live typically). unfortunately there is no processing model included. and unfortunately still, mastodon is the one gatekeeping based on the @context (which it shouldn't!)
trwnh
at
2026-03-05 20:16
-
stop asking for JSON-LD religion/faith. start demanding comprehensive test suites that are maintained, if broad interop and stuff "just working" for users and devs is your goal
[tantek]
at
2026-03-05 20:08
-
and again, if "assume the network is mastodon then it all works out fine... except there's a lot of stuff getting dropped, but you'll never see it" is the problem you want to solve, that would have been better solved with actual spec-specific comprehensive test suites that were maintained
[tantek]
at
2026-03-05 20:08
-
The "one protocol per release" problem has nothing to do with JSON-LD or failure to "adhere" to it. It has everything to do with the lack of a maintained test suite
[tantek]1
at
2026-03-05 19:03
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.01s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23