400642
results for ""a""
-
I had a rule like that decades ago, it blocked a lot of things it shouldn't have
petermolnar
at
2026-10-29 16:30
-
they should be relevant to the meetup topic/name, not just a random zoom social - we have co-unworking for that
[tantek]
at
2026-10-29 15:18
-
agreed [capjamesg] — guidance for HWC facilitators is a better path for this than tweaking principles
[tantek]
at
2026-10-29 15:13
-
And as a general indieweb principle, we focus on what we build...not as much on what we use to build it
GWG
at
2026-10-29 15:07
-
agreed to direct folks who want to go deep on a specific tool (AI or otherwise) to consider proposing, hosting a pop-up on that tool (or approach)
[tantek]
at
2026-10-29 15:01
-
That’s a good point. I think for HWC, if a discussion comes up enough, we might want to intervene and say “hey, we notice this has been coming up a lot lately, maybe you’d like to run a pop up on it?”
[capjamesg]
at
2026-10-29 14:57
-
i imagine the gateway is not the only one on the indieweb using no UA...bad practice but maybe not so uncommon. might end up missing a lot of interaction opportunities
simpleauthority
at
2026-10-29 14:35
-
that's quite a conspiracy theory 😆 https://www.google.com/search?q=iocaine
[snarfed]
at
2026-10-29 14:31
-
Or are you saying it isn't a principle we should highlight?
GWG
at
2026-10-29 14:25
-
I think more important doesn't mean not important at all... but where do you think is a good place to address this as a principle without removing a legitimate discussion about concerns about using things?
GWG
at
2026-10-29 14:23
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.02s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23