369770 results for ""a""

  • It was a site I set up to allow people to upload SVGs and provide a PNG preview for twitter/fb etc as a way to encourage SVG use
    [KevinMarks] at 2024-11-06 01:33
  • Woah that’s a lot. What was svgshare?
    [mattl] at 2024-11-06 01:31
  • ugh sorry [KevinMarks], yeah they moved those a while back
    [snarfed] at 2024-11-06 01:26
  • You used to be able to set a daily limit, after which it would 404 for a bit.
    [KevinMarks] at 2024-11-06 01:16
  • I guess I'd worry a bit about different implementors only knowing/caring about their own subset of use cases, so if they feel encouraged to ignore compliance for anything else, that hurts interop for features that are still user-relevant, right?
    [snarfed] at 2024-11-05 23:40
  • to be fair, that would require implementors to dig in and understand the whole breadth and depth of use cases, which may often be a big task, and is kind of hopefully what standards bodies are supposed to do - and are hopefully better at - so that implementors don't have to, right?
    [snarfed] at 2024-11-05 23:38
  • webfinger never struck me as a particularly large spec with a ton of abstract features, but I doubt I've actually read it end to end
    [snarfed] at 2024-11-05 23:35
  • So no, "compliance" tests of large abstract specs are counter-productive and a waste of time IMO
    [tantek] at 2024-11-05 23:34
  • Because webfinger never properly went thru a "CR" phase where each feature is evaluated by if it matters to implementations or not
    [tantek] at 2024-11-05 23:32
  • sure, that's a good way to prioritize
    [snarfed] at 2024-11-05 23:31
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.04s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23