1678816
results for "*"
-
If your static site generator meets the needs, I'd suggest sticking with that to start since you're familiar and confident with it already. WordPress can add more dynamic features, like a local comment form, but also has more /admintax tradeoffs
gRegor
at
2025-06-25 01:23
-
some background on https://indieweb.org/web_hosting
[snarfed]
at
2025-06-25 01:19
-
isaisaeatmypizza lots of tradeoffs! your time and effort, maybe monetary cost, ecosystem support, hosting options, etc. no one size fits all advice, it's up to you
[snarfed]
at
2025-06-25 01:19
-
I made a static website last month and I've grown pretty comfortable with html, css and js. I'm confident I could easily make my partner's blog with this, but I'm curious about other kinds of approaches. Should I use wordpress? Blogger? Are there genuine advantages to those, or can I get away with writing the code like I did for mine
isaisaeatmypizza
at
2025-06-25 01:17
-
hey! My partner wanted to make a blog and I offered to help them build it
isaisaeatmypizza
at
2025-06-25 01:17
-
Plenty of folks doing generating static files also
[tantek]2
at
2025-06-25 00:20
-
Would rather batch generate static HTML
eikimart
at
2025-06-25 00:12
-
Thanks, but I have no particular love for PHP, I'd like to get away from that approach actually
eikimart
at
2025-06-25 00:12
-
edited /MediaWiki:Sidebar (-51) "drop 2024 Gift Calendar until we're ready to launch the 2025 Gift Calendar
Loqi
at
2025-06-24 23:58
-
edited /downtime (-221) "move a meta services outage to their page
Loqi
at
2025-06-24 23:51
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.11s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23