18021
results for "bridgy"
-
[snarfed] was browsing the Bridgy Publish (classic) site to see which silos were still supported, and I noticed the stats link, clicked: https://snarfed.org/?s=bridgy%20stats - was there no stats 2024 post or was it perhaps not categorized to show up in this query or ? (also for 2025?)_
[tantek]
at
2025-07-10 00:47
-
sigh yup. sometimes I never figure it out, and have to resort to workaround like this from just yesterday 😕 https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/commit/3eeeb42d24175e14f528ec2b54765919bb84e244
[snarfed]
at
2025-07-09 21:43
-
and yet 😆 https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/741#issuecomment-293325007
[tantek]
at
2025-07-09 19:47
-
[preview] [tantek] #741 Bridgy Publish to Twitter should consider u-featured fallback for u-photo for article use-case
Loqi
at
2025-07-09 19:45
-
hah [tantek] looks like you actually asked for the opposite, ie attach u-featured if there's no u-photo 😆 https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/741
[snarfed]
at
2025-07-09 19:45
-
right now, Bridgy Publish includes both u-photo *and* u-featured as attachments, but I'm thinking it shouldn't do that for u-featured. thoughts?
[snarfed]
at
2025-07-09 16:18
-
I've been talking with someone a bit about the difference between u-photo and u-featured for articles, and whether/when Bridgy Publish should include those images as attachments on its POSSE copies. https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy/issues/1934
[snarfed]
at
2025-07-09 16:17
-
[pfefferle] sorry for the trouble! Looks like this is with Bridgy classic, ie https://brid.gy/ , not Bridgy Fed?
[snarfed]
at
2025-07-09 16:13
-
The table of contents at the top of that bridgy docs might be more helpful, it's kind of like an FAQ page, not something you need to read through every bit of to start though
gRegor
at
2025-07-08 04:49
-
Bridgy docs have details: https://brid.gy/about#publishing
gRegor
at
2025-07-08 04:20