381129 results for ""a""

  • I have done this with many a Flickr photo that I was either asked to remove from public view, or felt like I should based on other contextual information I had
    [tantek] at 2025-09-02 01:07
  • people may revoke consent too, especially if the action has not yet taken place (e.g. publishing a photo)
    [tantek] at 2025-09-02 01:04
  • GWG, not how accurate a model/analogy that "statue of limitations" is, however, I do think your intuition is correct that there is something about posting much older photos that implies a different kind of consent
    [tantek] at 2025-09-02 01:04
  • For example if I posted old IWC photos.. technically those people consented at the time, but...is there a statute of limitations
    GWG at 2025-09-02 01:01
  • https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/JuDlPRWOFWY/m/5OjxV2Y-DgAJ?pli=1 < - View transitions are apparently being turned on in Firefox. I liked this posts succintness and a window into the process of shipping a feature like this
    [morganm] at 2025-09-02 00:28
  • Still, I feel like a visible warning would be a better UX, clearer intent, and would help handle edge cases (thinking about people like me, who middle-click links typically to open them in new tabs in the background, which here likely wouldn't do anything and I wouldn't even notice)
    [Murray] at 2025-09-02 00:06
  • Oh, and if you activate a `<dialog>` as a modal window (via JS) it will even handle the focus trapping for you, which is otherwise a complete pain 😄
    [Murray] at 2025-09-02 00:05
  • However, if you're set on the modal route, then I'd say a `<dialog>` is ideal. It has all of the benefits of Popover, but far fewer browser compat issues. Hit a button, get a modal window, select a "continue onwards" link, or close out. They're keyboard navigable, work on mobile, and well understood by most browsers and assistive tech
    [Murray] at 2025-09-02 00:04
  • Something basic like "(Warning: Potentially Unsafe Link) `<a href="http://unsafe-link">`Fancy Website `</a>`" feels like it would get the point across as well as a sudden context switch and unexpected pop up
    [Murray] at 2025-09-02 00:02
  • Instead, I'd say put a visible warning in front of any link deemed hazardous. A simple text warning, maybe with a little ⚠️ (warning) icon or emoji, some bold styles or colours, would be sufficient. If you want to provide further context, use a tooltip, i.e. a button placed alongside the link that opens up a `<dialog>` element with additional context, or expands some extra text
    [Murray] at 2025-09-02 00:01
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.03s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23