1744760 results for "*"

• oh yeah, CSS for style changes is literally what its made for 😄 I more mean things like CSS only lightboxes or carousels. They're technically clever, but they almost inevitably are inaccessible, as they can't actually update the state of the DOM (and even when CSS does impact the DOM, it often isn't exposed to the AOM, like with pseudo-element images
  [Murray] at 2026-07-03 21:52
• Generated the final version of the newsletter! This will be sent out at 3pm Pacific time. https://indieweb.org/this-week/2026-07-03.html
  Loqi at 2026-07-03 21:50
• It’s more performant than JS and can make use of classes like .illustration or .picture to not target any image
  thatoddshade at 2026-07-03 21:48
• anyways CSS-only implementations aren’t that bad if it’s just :focus { /* styling that makes the image BIG
  thatoddshade at 2026-07-03 21:47
• i meant
  thatoddshade at 2026-07-03 21:46
• i for some reason forgot irc doesnt support html
  thatoddshade at 2026-07-03 21:46
• I think I may have missed where `` comes into this though
[Murray] at 2026-07-03 21:45
• And whilst I enjoy CSS-only demos for the cleverness, they're almost always less accessible than ones with JS
  [Murray] at 2026-07-03 21:45
• Not sure I understand what you mean? Keeping interactivity as close to raw HTML will always have the best semantics, hence why things like
  are so useful
  
  [Murray] at 2026-07-03 21:44
• I think CSS and JavaScript–only approaches are the best, as adding any markup beyond <img> will affect semantics
  thatoddshade at 2026-07-03 21:43