381046
results for ""a""
-
For example if I posted old IWC photos.. technically those people consented at the time, but...is there a statute of limitations
GWG
at
2025-09-02 01:01
-
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-platform/c/JuDlPRWOFWY/m/5OjxV2Y-DgAJ?pli=1 < - View transitions are apparently being turned on in Firefox. I liked this posts succintness and a window into the process of shipping a feature like this
[morganm]
at
2025-09-02 00:28
-
Still, I feel like a visible warning would be a better UX, clearer intent, and would help handle edge cases (thinking about people like me, who middle-click links typically to open them in new tabs in the background, which here likely wouldn't do anything and I wouldn't even notice)
[Murray]
at
2025-09-02 00:06
-
Oh, and if you activate a `<dialog>` as a modal window (via JS) it will even handle the focus trapping for you, which is otherwise a complete pain 😄
[Murray]
at
2025-09-02 00:05
-
However, if you're set on the modal route, then I'd say a `<dialog>` is ideal. It has all of the benefits of Popover, but far fewer browser compat issues. Hit a button, get a modal window, select a "continue onwards" link, or close out. They're keyboard navigable, work on mobile, and well understood by most browsers and assistive tech
[Murray]
at
2025-09-02 00:04
-
Something basic like "(Warning: Potentially Unsafe Link) `<a href="http://unsafe-link">`Fancy Website `</a>`" feels like it would get the point across as well as a sudden context switch and unexpected pop up
[Murray]
at
2025-09-02 00:02
-
Instead, I'd say put a visible warning in front of any link deemed hazardous. A simple text warning, maybe with a little ⚠️ (warning) icon or emoji, some bold styles or colours, would be sufficient. If you want to provide further context, use a tooltip, i.e. a button placed alongside the link that opens up a `<dialog>` element with additional context, or expands some extra text
[Murray]
at
2025-09-02 00:01
-
If that is the case, then I'd probably suggest _not_ using a pop up/modal at all. There are a bunch of accessibility and UX concerns around having something styled like a link, that doesn't behave like a link; and I'd say that is doubly so if there are _other links_ on the site that behave "normally", making for an inconsistent experience
[Murray]
at
2025-09-01 23:59
-
@failxontour: not gonna lie, you've lost me a bit here 😄 I think you're wanting to warn people about potentially unsafe, offsite links? So when they press a link to an HTTP (or otherwise deemed "unsafe" site) they get a modal window pop up and say "Hey, here be dragons, continue at your own peril"?
[Murray]
at
2025-09-01 23:58
-
edited /lost_sites (-10) "thorough enough to no longer be a stub"
Loqi
at
2025-09-01 23:20
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.03s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23