2892
results for ""It works""
-
we build these panopticon services of power like facebook, twitter, gmail, etc where users dont have to know how it works -- if they did they would be repulsed!
[Forest_Johnson]
at
2021-03-07 21:27
-
The webmentions protocol is in a standards track, but the Big Boys (Reddit, Twitter, Facebook, Medium, etc) will never implement it because it's extra work for them that does not give them any benefit, in fact, it could hurt them because it works _against_ their interests to lock users into their platform.
[Forest_Johnson]
at
2021-03-07 18:34
-
I mean, if it works, you'll definitely see it
jacky
at
2021-03-04 19:39
-
Okay so I’ve just added the whoosh full-text index to Publ and it works amazingly well. But now I’m trying to figure out, from an API standpoint, if I should expose the search result metadata, or if it should just be a list of entries. Does anyone have any strong opinions? I don’t really see the value in exposing the actual metadata except for extreme nerdiness, like I don’t see the user story for letting people know the match score or
[fluffy]
at
2021-03-03 07:14
-
oh no it works fine [Murray] — those "chain of blank pages" are just days where I didn't post anything 🙈
[tantek]
at
2021-02-28 00:57
-
aaronpk interestingly I'm seeing my local authorization flow not working with Micropub.rocks :thinking: when the auth code is returned, it seems to just wait.. oddly it works on the live site, so not sure what's up
jamietanna
at
2021-02-25 19:43
-
possibly...? I can't find the bridgy link for it because of how it works on my end
aaronpk
at
2021-02-20 17:11
-
yeah.. it works so well for the simple use case
lahacker
at
2021-02-11 23:01
-
it works irc2slack, true
sknebel
at
2021-02-08 21:48
-
also, because Webmentions are frequently presented as the indie alternative to things like Disqus. Disqus works that way (a "drop it in and it works" service) so surely webmentions do to, right?
[Murray]
at
2021-02-08 19:01