1135 results for "fail"

  • reading the implied name issue again - if we stop implying a p-name, will that mean that api clients that assume that there is always a name will fail?
    [kevinmarks] at 2018-02-16 15:00
  • [18:56:04] <csarven> re "tantek is glad to see vcard as an explicit desired addition, instead of yet another SemWeb fork re-use" -- So, what's "reuse" and what's the "problem" with reuse? mf-1 "reused" terms from VCARD and serialized them entirely in its own way. So did mf-2 in a completely different non-backwards compatable way - Crystal clear longevity fail. All within ~5 years! Is there a particular need to bash SW (yet again)? Isn't that what the IWC
    csarven at 2018-02-14 19:15
  • vocab prolif = babel = interop fail
    tantek at 2018-02-14 19:01
  • re "tantek is glad to see vcard as an explicit desired addition, instead of yet another SemWeb fork re-use" -- So, what's "reuse" and what's the "problem" with reuse? mf-1 "reused" terms from VCARD and serialized them entirely in its own way. So did mf-2 in a completely different non-backwards compatable way - Crystal clear longevity fail. All within ~5 years! Is there a particular need to bash SW (yet again)? Isn't that what the IWC wiki is for? Can we
    csarven at 2018-02-14 18:56
  • so I understand this is a resolved issue now but just for my own understanding, if implementors refetch contexts on signature fail + cache expiry, why can't you migrate individual extension contexts into the main AS2 context?
    ajordan_ at 2018-02-14 18:38
  • (sry scribe fail)
    bengo at 2018-02-14 18:07
  • cwebber2: It would fail previously, but maybe not the case now that we have an '_' in there.
    bengo at 2018-02-14 18:00
  • ah, no, your regex would still fail if you mixed <url>-rels
    sknebel at 2018-02-14 17:56
  • bridgy publish also checks for synd links itself, so alternatively, you could just attempt to bridgy publish everything, and let it fail on non-syndicated posts
    snarfed at 2018-02-09 20:41
  • petermolnar, that’s what I think too. I find it weird how people scramble to support whatever meta tags an indexer dreams up all the time. Indexers (especially search engines) will always implement the semantics used by the majority anyway, otherwise they will fail as an indexer. But that’s just my opinion on the matter.
    Zegnat at 2018-02-09 10:39
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23