1258
results for "*pub nick:tantek"
-
Since we are able to do that, we also have the ability to add features to https://micropub.net/draft/ if we make it very clear we are doing so, and *either* declare Micropub to be a "Living Standard" (like https://html.spec.whatwg.org/ ) *or* version it (using semver)
[tantek]
at
2019-03-28 17:27
-
aaronpk, I'm curious what you think from a high level design perspective of pursuing a Micropub-parallel markup style for things like requesting adding (or removing!) tags, people, location from (other people's) existing posts: https://indieweb.org/edit#add_remove_properties_on_other_posts
[tantek]
at
2019-03-28 00:00
-
one way to provide equivalent markup for the Micropub semantic could be a "delete-of" property, the links to a URL, and then the other properties in the h-entry e.g. category could determine which property values to remove
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 19:09
-
while Micropub usually takes it's syntax from microformats, in this case the point would be to explore the opposite, to figure out the mf2 equivalent for the Micropub remove/"delete" operation: https://micropub.net/draft/#remove
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 19:00
-
Micropub already has the notion of deleting properties or specific property values, so I'd rather built on that if possible
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 18:59
-
I'm just the messenger in this example, not yet at the point of coding that with Micropub. I'll get there eventually now that I have https. 🙂
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:34
-
whoa I'd almost see it as the opposite, that a micropub developer could read the spec, then work their way through test cases to implement, and not have to reference any side-docs beyond that
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:25
-
I think someone mentioned recently having to check three places as a Micropub developer
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:23
-
[eddie] filtering is a UI thing, why does it need to be in a protocol spec like Micropub at all?
[tantek]
at
2019-03-14 20:58
-
also yay /Micropub!
[tantek]
at
2019-03-04 23:38