1257
results for "*pub nick:tantek"
-
aaronpk, I'm curious what you think from a high level design perspective of pursuing a Micropub-parallel markup style for things like requesting adding (or removing!) tags, people, location from (other people's) existing posts: https://indieweb.org/edit#add_remove_properties_on_other_posts
[tantek]
at
2019-03-28 00:00
-
one way to provide equivalent markup for the Micropub semantic could be a "delete-of" property, the links to a URL, and then the other properties in the h-entry e.g. category could determine which property values to remove
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 19:09
-
while Micropub usually takes it's syntax from microformats, in this case the point would be to explore the opposite, to figure out the mf2 equivalent for the Micropub remove/"delete" operation: https://micropub.net/draft/#remove
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 19:00
-
Micropub already has the notion of deleting properties or specific property values, so I'd rather built on that if possible
[tantek]
at
2019-03-27 18:59
-
I'm just the messenger in this example, not yet at the point of coding that with Micropub. I'll get there eventually now that I have https. 🙂
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:34
-
whoa I'd almost see it as the opposite, that a micropub developer could read the spec, then work their way through test cases to implement, and not have to reference any side-docs beyond that
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:25
-
I think someone mentioned recently having to check three places as a Micropub developer
[tantek]
at
2019-03-26 05:23
-
[eddie] filtering is a UI thing, why does it need to be in a protocol spec like Micropub at all?
[tantek]
at
2019-03-14 20:58
-
also yay /Micropub!
[tantek]
at
2019-03-04 23:38
-
so that would be a very different kind of micropub client, one that pops-up and asks you, instead of you activating it
[tantek]
at
2019-03-04 19:04