1669803 results for "*"

• reference numbers makes sense, I suppose, when using numbers for footnotes
  btrem at 2025-04-28 23:38
• re: "since the footnote often contains references", I'd say those are citations
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:38
• ah, even that Wikipedia article calls them "footnote reference (numbers
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:37
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Note_(typography)#Location
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:37
• Seems like footnote reference can be confusing, since the footnote often contains references, e.g., [1] op.cit, p. 234 or whatever
  btrem at 2025-04-28 23:36
• also "cue" is one of the worst words to use for speakability / listenability. cue? Q? queue
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:34
• btrem, I use footnote references and expansions
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:34
• yeah like that's not overloaded
  [tantek] at 2025-04-28 23:34
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Note_(typography) uses "cue
  gRegor at 2025-04-28 23:33
• A footnote is a typographical convention predating the web for indicating more information is available about a word, phrase, or sentence by the use of an immediately adjacent superscript (usually a number), and the presentation of the same superscript followed by a note, often a citation, in the footer of the page, and sometimes used on the web instead of inline hyperlinks to reduce reader distraction https://indieweb.org/footnote
  Loqi at 2025-04-28 23:32

Filter results by:

• indieweb (834648)
• dev (369923)
• meta (169560)
• microformats (117501)
• wordpress (77810)
• social (74434)
• known (16527)
• stream (8272)
• bridgy (1011)
• events (114)

Query took 0.09s.

Search tips

Exclusion

+foo -bar

Logical OR

foo OR bar

Exact phrase

"foo bar"

Partial words

foo*

Particular fields only

title:foo

domain:example.org

nick:somebody

after:2016-11-23

before:2016-11-23

date:2016-11-23