369693 results for ""a""

  • !tell aaronpk, Can I get the allowed client_id for IBC updated in indielogin? It's been `https://indiebookclub.biz/id` for a bit now, but just realized today it was preventing some people from signing in since indielogin has it without the "/id"
    gRegor at 2024-11-13 23:07
  • I have a small screen and I like for the text to take as much width possible
    paotsaq at 2024-11-13 21:08
  • Aaand that is (unfortunately) a night that I'm not at home (as per usual 😅)
    [Murray] at 2024-11-13 18:00
  • [preview] Breakpoint-based type sizing has always felt a bit arbitrary to me. It seems like equal parts guesswork and compromise, where the better we want it to work, the more stuff we need to design. It strikes me as inelegant and inefficient. Over the past f...
    Loqi at 2024-11-13 17:55
  • User choice is so powerful. In one FrESH I shared the utopia dot fyi site -- https://utopia.fyi/blog/designing-with-fluid-type-scales -- which uses calc as a base size and is interesting. Though there are schools of thought that setting a base font is antithetical to user choice. For me as a practical matter if you set it larger that seems unobjectionable. Setting it smaller seems objectionable though, to me. All these matters of opinion.
    [Joe_Crawford] at 2024-11-13 17:55
  • I thought about applying a `font-size: 1.1em;` rule to the html tag, which would step everything up a bit.
    capjamesg[d] at 2024-11-13 17:53
  • i usually have my text size scaled up on all websites too so im probably not the best authority. so for me it could be a bit bigger. but i think the line height works v nicely
    [Jo] at 2024-11-13 17:53
  • it's nice. though on my larger monitor I zoom it a bit but I do that for most sites on that monitor. It scales nicely.
    [Joe_Crawford] at 2024-11-13 17:52
  • On my ultrawide, 2K monitor, I would definitely be happy if it were a little larger, but it's not problematic at all (and, thankfully, isn't _massive_ like some sides do these days 😄)
    [Murray] at 2024-11-13 17:41
  • When is it? I'd say unlikely, though, I'm afraid. Also not sure it will be in a "showable" situation. The whole concept is going to be private posting with some public-facing aspects, and I'm still working through the redaction process
    [Murray] at 2024-11-13 17:40
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.03s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23