737
results for "nick:Loqi agree"
-
[Zegnat] Upon reading the Webmention spec again, specifically [verification](https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/#webmention-verification), I agree that my implementation might be wrong. I think Telegraph shouldn’t be using the mf2 parser at all if it only imp...
Loqi
at
2017-08-23 19:12
-
[Jeremy Cherfas] I've been thinking about Rob's post and your notes on vHWC, and I agree that swapping the quiet writing hour for a question session makes a lot of sense. I've certainly learned a lot and look forward to the meetings. One thing I'd like to suggest ...
Loqi
at
2017-08-23 18:34
-
[superfeedr] "I've been thinking about Rob's post and your notes on vHWC, and I agree that swapping the quiet writing hour for a question session makes" by Jeremy Cherfas on 2017-08-20 https://stream.jeremycherfas.net/2017/ive-been-thinking-about-robs-post-and-your-notes-on
Loqi
at
2017-08-21 20:32
-
[superfeedr] "I've been thinking about Rob's post and your notes on vHWC, and I agree that swapping the quiet writing hour for a question session makes" by Jeremy Cherfas on 2017-08-20 http://stream.jeremycherfas.net/2017/ive-been-thinking-about-robs-post-and-your-notes-on
Loqi
at
2017-08-20 08:30
-
I agree
Loqi
at
2017-08-15 20:07
-
I agree
Loqi
at
2017-07-25 16:53
-
@martijnvdven @withknown @benwerd I agree w/ features, but was confused about direction and support. This thread is… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/889199007884562432
Loqi
at
2017-07-23 19:02
-
cwebber2: ajordan left you a message 6 hours, 55 minutes ago: at ben_thatmustbeme's suggestion I put a list of AP issues we're likely to cover at https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2017-07-18; hope that's okay (and that you agree with my prioritization). there's also the mediaUpload issue (which is *not* on that list) which I *thought* we decided to punt to today, although I might have been thinking about the likes/shares question instead
Loqi
at
2017-07-18 16:18
-
cwebber2: ajordan left you a message 6 hours, 52 minutes ago: also I was kind of thinking we should clean up the issue tracker a bit? some things everybody's collectively agreed to handle it in the CG (like the private messages issue) or we've resolved to not handle in the core spec (e.g. revision ids)... would be nice to open new issues in the CG tracker and close w3c/activitypub issues in favor of the new ones. dunno if you agree with that
Loqi
at
2017-07-18 16:18
-
I agree
Loqi
at
2017-06-19 18:28