96168 results for "wordpress"

  • I think all of the plugins started as WordPress plugins and it would be sad if we couldn't make use of new features, only because ClassicPress is not keeping up!?
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-20 12:31
  • I think this is a general problem ClassicPress needs to handle if they want to be compatible with WordPress for the long term!?
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-20 12:29
  • what about checking why and filing a PR to make it compatible again
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-20 12:28
  • [pfefferle]: Also ActivityPub is no longer quite ClassicPress compatible. Makes me wonder if I should look for another solution there
    GWG at 2025-12-19 23:10
  • As for the icon set, I agree with you fully it's gotten a lot bigger than originally. I have not yet come up with a solution that doesn't require us to curate a list or the users to do manual work... ideas
    GWG at 2025-12-19 22:16
  • [pfefferle]: It was 4.9, they rebased to 6.2
    GWG at 2025-12-19 22:14
  • sure, let's downgrade to 6.2 if that is possible
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-19 22:12
  • never mind... even if this document is quite up to date, there seem to be different numbers around... https://docs.classicpress.net/user-guides/using-classicpress/managing-plugins
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-19 22:12
  • that is insane! WordPress 4.9 is almost 9 years old!!!
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-19 21:44
  • > If in doubt, give preference to a ClassicPress Directory Plugin, or one that is specifically tagged as such in the WordPress Repository. Do _not_ install and use Plugins from WordPress that are requiring WordPress versions higher than 4.9, because you will A) not receive updates for them, and B) they might break your site.
    [pfefferle] at 2025-12-19 21:40
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23