396 results for "microformats hard"

  • jeremycherfas know anything about this: https://github.com/danpros/htmly seems to have pretty decent reviews and actively maintained. peaking at the templates microformats would not be hard to add (remember your client doesn't care)
    [jgmac1106] at 2022-03-06 15:07
  • unrelated to this specifically, but about the parsing spec: since I was gone, has there been any discussion about how multi-line plaintext values are parsed? the way parsers currently handle line breaks and img src and alt text in p- and struct value keys can make them hard to use
    barnaby at 2022-02-23 20:57
  • But if we are indeed talking about writing stuff like ical/vcard entries in plain readable text I was always fan of reStructuredText interpreted text and directives. The goal of rST, driven by the hard to extend nature of old ST, was to have as much as possible forward compatibility and extension points if we want to put in structured data or other features.
    ccx at 2022-02-23 15:59
  • Are microformats supposed to work if they are client-side generated / added to the DOM by JavaScript? That sounds kind of hard to consume without actual browser.
    ccx at 2022-02-22 01:04
  • Err, I've meant it's hard to tell one should parse the site for microformats. But the same difficulty applies to regular feeds.
    ccx at 2022-02-22 00:18
  • It wouldn't be too hard to add h-dir, h-file, p-mod-time, p-size, etc to that listing and make it machine readable
    Anders at 2022-02-19 00:40
  • Good to know! I don’t know how hard this will be to tackle but I’ll take a look.
    capjamesg[d] at 2022-02-18 23:57
  • The usecase that is still hard to mark up is the calendar grid for events where you have time down and different tracks across.
    [KevinMarks] at 2022-02-08 00:45
  • duration isn't too hard (thanks regex)
    jacky at 2022-02-07 23:34
  • jacky: sknebel left you a message 8 hours, 15 minutes ago: "so a test failed b/c it's mentioned h-org as a type (the parser does hard failures on unrecognized types)" <- there is no concept of "recognized" types in mf2 parsing! don't do that please
    Loqi at 2022-02-06 19:48
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23