17998
results for "bridgy"
-
[snarfed]: Did I just crash Bridgy Publish? Got a 500 when trying to publish using HTML content.
GWG
at
2024-10-06 05:50
-
[snarfed] does this comment mean I should try posting again today to see if AP federation is working again? https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/885#issuecomment-2394529651
[tantek]
at
2024-10-05 00:24
-
it helps, but sadly I don't have any more data to go on, at least from Bridgy Fed alone. inbox deliveries are still returning HTTP 202
[snarfed]
at
2024-10-04 01:54
-
All other recent posts were only responses e.g. using Bridgy Publish to GitHub
[tantek]
at
2024-10-04 01:03
-
!tell [snarfed] looks like another post of mine didn't make it into various hashtags and profiles via BF, and this time I did NOT link to https Kevin Marks 😕 https://indieweb.social/tags/w3cTPAC and https://w3c.social/@tantek.com@tantek.com (empty 😢 ) have no sign of my newest post which Bridgy Fed says it delivered to 317 instances
[tantek]
at
2024-10-04 00:54
-
wait can i switch from bridgy fed-ing to bluesky, to bridgy-ing to my main bluesky account? orrr
catgirlin.space
at
2024-09-27 22:18
-
there's also https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/800 , which is somewhat related
[snarfed]
at
2024-09-27 21:03
-
[snarfed], the bsky federation got me thinking, should I mark up my canonical bsky link on my site with mf2 for Bridgy Fed somehow? Not that I expect BF to federate to it, but maybe as a way to avoid dupe accounts like that.
gRegor
at
2024-09-27 21:01
-
ben sorry for the trouble! looks like either you added the synd links after many of those responses, or bridgy didn't discover them until after many of the responses
[snarfed]
at
2024-09-26 00:13
-
i guess the question is how do i debug further? i've already looked in the bridgy log and it has a line in there saying the syn-relationship is already discovered
ben
at
2024-09-25 23:58