382591 results for ""a""

  • I'm feeling pretty dumb. In the past, I was able to log in to indieweb.org with my domain, and somewhere along the way lost my indieauth-metadata.json file. I tried to authenticate with Bluesky, but I have it set up to use a short form that redirects to my domain (denm.ch => denmchenry.com). The result is that I signed in as a new account, denm.ch, instead of denmchenry.com.
    denmch at 2025-10-26 02:34
  • "use strict" if you got a use it
    [morganm] at 2025-10-26 00:42
  • I think a lot of people feel the same way but it is a big part of the web still
    [morganm] at 2025-10-26 00:42
  • ECMAscript, JSX as framework, code safety, validation issues, regex issues, let's not talk abou js math json.... as binding way for headless data operation. Go away, jQuery being the fix for a huge portion of webdevs for a long time.... just no... I refuse to learn JS til today even though Im missing out.
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:42
  • The more I discovered about JS the more it just feels like a weird poison potion to me that I do not wanna touch for crying out loud
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:40
  • Adding a title="" could also avoid some of my issues mentioned and be the easiest goto that's fully supported rn
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:32
  • so for my case I will probably have to and will for my own saneness stick to the preventive use of <a> element for now while I don't like rewriting and repeating myself often again. I kind brought this up to myself. As with button you neither have the preview text options from the browser itself.
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:14
  • That being said. I think the modal approach is great for these dialog options but would like to enhance some details to it if you use it say for my case what I found out on selfwiki.de is that they state you should wrap them inside a <form> element with the method="dialog" that way you can keep closedby="any" approach present
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:06
  • I basically always tried the nonmodal approach first with the commandfor element well expecting different results I am a simple person I like simple solutions this ain't it. So back to the drawing board the modal approach could be the one I am looking for so far in my testing where you can implement both of the goodies. But that would mess up the experience onsite. Espeically if you'd be like me and don't like to use JavaScript
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:04
  • hm [Murray] I been dabbling with your input just now kinda feel guilty for not doing something on the website for so long and even thought I learnt this stuff I have to admit i never heard of a modal, nonmodal approach before and I think your approach as you mentioned just giving out a clear indicator might be the right way arround. Otherwise the usability of the site will probably just take a hit for the worse for a simple link aggregator se
    failxontour at 2025-10-26 00:02
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.05s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23