1128
results for "fail"
-
Looks like that's it. My understanding is that Together has fairly strict expectations for data structures, but I agree it would be better to fail gracefully. I'll create an issue in Together
jackjamieson
at
2019-08-13 17:04
-
hmm I suppose Together should fail gracefully
KartikPrabhu
at
2019-08-13 17:01
-
!tell zegnat If the people who create the stylesheet I want to use via CDN change the content of the stylesheet, then any hash I generate is going to fail, isn't it?
jeremycherfas
at
2019-08-09 15:02
-
will be fun to watch my tests fail and show exactly what changes they're making
aaronpk
at
2019-08-09 01:03
-
so that presumably means we're missing a test case from micropub.rocks that would pass in one and fail in the other, assuming both Monocle and Quill pass 100% of the existing micropub.rocks test suite which I would expect since aaronpk wrote all 3
[tantek]
at
2019-08-07 22:29
-
instead of XML / SQL style "fail all the things"
[tantek]
at
2019-08-07 18:46
-
Laziness fail
jeremycherfas
at
2019-08-05 14:24
-
tonz I have thought a lot about the personalized assistant, though I am android so my workflow might be different. Currently I have a #pinboard https://quickthoughts.jgregorymcverry.com/content/all/?q=%23pinboard and I fooled around with to-do list a lot…until i fail…early and often
jgmac1106
at
2019-08-05 13:29
-
That's fair, but conversion to atom will fail validation without a title, so you'll see a generated one
[KevinMarks]
at
2019-07-31 17:26
-
link verification would fail here, and the webmention would be rejected
cweiske
at
2019-07-31 14:14
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.01s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23