364
results for "nofollow"
-
my biggest concern with using any link i don't put rel=nofollow on is puts the burden on me to worry about who i link, rather than the other way around which was what this was for. maybe i am being overly cautious, but I see this as a shortcut through any extra spam filtering, so I want to make sure what is getting through is as clean as possible
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2014-10-01 20:36
-
until we rel=nofollow any links from anyone not listed in /irc-people
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:35
-
ben_thatmustbeme: ok I'll challenge you to find non-rel-nofollow spam links on google.com - go for it
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:34
-
if you get a well known brand trying to spam you, you can a) block them (black list), b) embarrass them by posting about it with a rel=nofollow link
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:33
-
danlyke - can you show non-rel-nofollow links from huffpo or sfgate to advertisers?
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:32
-
If a link has rel=nofollow, it shouldn't be used for vouching, correct?
gRegor`
at
2014-10-01 20:31
-
I suggest that any hyperlinks in any statements from anyone in the logs who is *not* in /irc-people have rel=nofollow place upon them, so people can't use the logs for vouching
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:30
-
cuibonobo: no list. just a link without rel-nofollow
tantek
at
2014-10-01 20:18
-
aaronpk_: i'm trying to understand the `vouch` extension. are you saying that you can vouch for someone if you have their site on a list where the link *does not* have rel=nofollow?
cuibonobo
at
2014-10-01 20:18
-
or if they do, *then* you can a) tell them directly, and then link to them with nofollow.
tantek
at
2014-10-01 14:48