362 results for "nofollow"

  • ben_thatmustbeme: ok I'll challenge you to find non-rel-nofollow spam links on google.com - go for it
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:34
  • if you get a well known brand trying to spam you, you can a) block them (black list), b) embarrass them by posting about it with a rel=nofollow link
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:33
  • danlyke - can you show non-rel-nofollow links from huffpo or sfgate to advertisers?
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:32
  • If a link has rel=nofollow, it shouldn't be used for vouching, correct?
    gRegor` at 2014-10-01 20:31
  • I suggest that any hyperlinks in any statements from anyone in the logs who is *not* in /irc-people have rel=nofollow place upon them, so people can't use the logs for vouching
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:30
  • cuibonobo: no list. just a link without rel-nofollow
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:18
  • aaronpk_: i'm trying to understand the `vouch` extension. are you saying that you can vouch for someone if you have their site on a list where the link *does not* have rel=nofollow?
    cuibonobo at 2014-10-01 20:18
  • or if they do, *then* you can a) tell them directly, and then link to them with nofollow.
    tantek at 2014-10-01 14:48
  • ben_thatmustbe: in general you should NOT put rel=nofollow on your links - that's the point - you're linking to something you think has relevance and that someone you're likely ok with commenting on your posts
    tantek at 2014-10-01 14:46
  • hmm, okay so only on links without nofollow. I don't always put no-follow links in articles I post.
    ben_thatmust at 2014-10-01 13:10
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0.01s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23