73
results for "ChatGPT"
-
We say don't copy from Wikipedia or ChatGPT. The pattern should be "Use your own words to express a relevant definition that will be helpful to readers of the wiki."
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:55
-
I can see ChatGPT being used in this sort of arena, where you know _what_ you want to say, but you don't know _exactly how_ to say it.
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:45
-
it is, in that I'm saying the wiki is not the place to experiment with ChatGPT to get better at using a language.
[tantek]
at
2023-12-19 20:44
-
"if someone wants to use ChatGPT to learn a language, that's their prerogative." -- that's not related.
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:43
-
if someone wants to use ChatGPT to learn a language, that's their prerogative. I'd rather they learn then use their skills to write in their own words.
[tantek]
at
2023-12-19 20:38
-
capjamesg, I disagree about using ChatGPT to help someone "get their point across".
[tantek]
at
2023-12-19 20:37
-
[preview] The IndieWeb (according to ChatGPT)
Loqi
at
2023-12-19 20:37
-
Also potentially relevant: https://jamesg.blog/2022/12/01/indieweb-chatgpt/
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:36
-
I think ChatGPT, et al. could be used to help someone for whom {language} is not their first language get their point across.
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:33
-
"Please do not use tools like ChatGPT to write a complete definition for the IndieWeb wiki. Tools like ChatGPT should instead be used to guide you to a definition that you think clearly conveys the point you want to make."
capjamesg
at
2023-12-19 20:33
Sort by:
Filter results by:
Tag
Query took 0.01s.
Search tips
- Exclusion
- +foo -bar
- Logical OR
- foo OR bar
- Exact phrase
- "foo bar"
- Partial words
- foo*
- Particular fields only
- title:foo
- domain:example.org
- nick:somebody
- after:2016-11-23
- before:2016-11-23
- date:2016-11-23