357 results for "nofollow"

  • aaronpk_: i would definitely prefer an explicit whitelist to being watchful of what does / doesn't have rel-nofollow
    cuibonobo at 2014-10-01 20:39
  • Yeah, I was just thinking we could rel=nofollow all links from IRC logs, then just use /irc-people
    gRegor` at 2014-10-01 20:39
  • if you ever get a spam link via a vouch, go see who vouched for it, and then give them a hard time, up to and including replacing all your links to them with rel=nofollow
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:38
  • my biggest concern with using any link i don't put rel=nofollow on is puts the burden on me to worry about who i link, rather than the other way around which was what this was for. maybe i am being overly cautious, but I see this as a shortcut through any extra spam filtering, so I want to make sure what is getting through is as clean as possible
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2014-10-01 20:36
  • until we rel=nofollow any links from anyone not listed in /irc-people
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:35
  • ben_thatmustbeme: ok I'll challenge you to find non-rel-nofollow spam links on google.com - go for it
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:34
  • if you get a well known brand trying to spam you, you can a) block them (black list), b) embarrass them by posting about it with a rel=nofollow link
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:33
  • danlyke - can you show non-rel-nofollow links from huffpo or sfgate to advertisers?
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:32
  • If a link has rel=nofollow, it shouldn't be used for vouching, correct?
    gRegor` at 2014-10-01 20:31
  • I suggest that any hyperlinks in any statements from anyone in the logs who is *not* in /irc-people have rel=nofollow place upon them, so people can't use the logs for vouching
    tantek at 2014-10-01 20:30
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23