357 results for "nofollow"

  • tantek: it occurs to me that in my reply context and comments presentation I should add rel=nofollow to any links that appear in other peoples' posts on my site. does that sound reasonable?
    aaronpk at 2014-10-17 23:03
  • so given a URL, X, that i am responding to, and a list of referrers to me, R, (that i verified are good and don't use rel=nofollow), download page X and search for all links without rel=nofollow. for each of those, check them against my list R, if R(X) returns a value, i'm done. if none are found, i move on to checking the base domain. and repeat. if still none are found, i look for all rel=me links that are on in the
    ben_thatmust at 2014-10-17 19:36
  • edited /Vouch (+679) "/* How To */ Webmention with Vouch testing support (without rel=nofollow)"
    Loqi at 2014-10-17 19:33
  • i'm supposed to check that the vouch links to the source domain without rel=nofollow, right?
    aaronpk at 2014-10-17 16:47
  • so you should nofollow the subscriptions you don't vouch for?
    KevinMarks__ at 2014-10-14 00:46
  • Would adding rel="vouch" be redundant? If you link without rel="nofollow" it is already a vouch-worthy link
    KevinMarks_ at 2014-10-14 00:00
  • i wouldn't trust twitter at all, links don't even include rel=nofollow
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2014-10-13 22:50
  • B publishes his list as described, without rel-nofollow
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2014-10-13 22:44
  • vs with rel=nofollow its just the first
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2014-10-13 22:38
  • i just can't decide if i want to make that list rel=nofollow or not
    ben_thatmustbeme at 2014-10-13 22:29
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23