364
results for "nofollow"
-
wonder if it doesn't like the nofollow bit of them
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2014-12-16 16:09
-
GWG, cool. doing distributed "abuse report" posts that are verifiable could be quite useful. of course you'd have to use rel-nofollow to link to the items of abuse, which is yucky too.
tantek
at
2014-12-05 00:51
-
<span class="ProfileHeaderCard-urlText u-dir" dir="ltr"><a class="u-textUserColor" target="_blank" rel="me nofollow" href="http://t.co/s4pwvNGLQK" title="http://ShkintyBoda.org">
GWG
at
2014-11-20 02:43
-
edited /rel-nofollow (+75) "Suggest notally"
Loqi
at
2014-11-13 21:27
-
odd that it has rel=nofollow where it should have rel=me to the other profile / contact links
tantek
at
2014-11-11 18:57
-
minimizing use of rel-nofollow is a good thing
tantek
at
2014-10-17 23:06
-
aaronpk - sure. you could also do a quick "approval test" of such links and add rel-nofollow if they fail
tantek
at
2014-10-17 23:06
-
tantek: it occurs to me that in my reply context and comments presentation I should add rel=nofollow to any links that appear in other peoples' posts on my site. does that sound reasonable?
aaronpk
at
2014-10-17 23:03
-
so given a URL, X, that i am responding to, and a list of referrers to me, R, (that i verified are good and don't use rel=nofollow), download page X and search for all links without rel=nofollow. for each of those, check them against my list R, if R(X) returns a value, i'm done. if none are found, i move on to checking the base domain. and repeat. if still none are found, i look for all rel=me links that are on in the
ben_thatmust
at
2014-10-17 19:36
-
edited /Vouch (+679) "/* How To */ Webmention with Vouch testing support (without rel=nofollow)"
Loqi
at
2014-10-17 19:33