364
results for "nofollow"
-
I think we should not depend on nor recommend anything to use "nofollow" - it's been horribly abused and now I think it's bad for web publishing in general.
tantek
at
2015-05-12 18:16
-
i agree that it fits the same bucket as rel="nofollow", i also suggested possibility of adding it in the same section
elf-pavlik
at
2015-05-12 10:42
-
"ceivers SHOULD moderate Webmentions, and if a link is displayed back to the source, SHOULD link to source with rel="nofollow" to prevent spam."
elf-pavlik
at
2015-05-12 10:31
-
:/ gitlab has links to your own profile as rel=nofollow ... no "me" rel in there
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2015-04-25 14:25
-
bodyHtml: "<p><a vocab="http://schema.org" typeof="Person" rel="nofollow" resource="acct:normal1@qa-prod.fyre.co" data-lf-handle="" data-lf-provider="livefyre" property="url" target="_blank" class="fyre-mention fyre-mention-livefyre">@<span property="name">normal1</span></a> replying test</p>",
indie-visitor
at
2015-03-26 02:55
-
browsers drop the referrer headers when a link is tagged rel=nofollow
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2015-03-20 01:31
-
<a vocab="http://schema.org" typeof="Person" rel="nofollow" resource="acct:a2eae1c3-00d1-4c31-b81e-f47a15e0985f@foxnewsprod.fyre.co" data-lf-handle="" data-lf-provider="livefyre" property="url" target="_blank" class="fyre-mention fyre-mention-livefyre">@<span property="name">Demswinin16</span></a>
bengo
at
2015-03-16 09:15
-
yes, rel=nofollow is not a valid vouch
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2015-03-16 03:16
-
Looks like it's matching any rel-value on an href, correct? Because you want to skip the rel=nofollow links subsequently.
gRegor`
at
2015-03-16 03:13
-
edited /rel-nofollow (-151) "/* examples in the wild */"
Loqi
at
2015-01-06 12:59