1254
results for "*pub nick:tantek"
-
sorry yes that's what I meant. this is Bridgy Pub as it were
[tantek]
at
2022-11-23 18:33
-
that said, if Flickr / Don is considering AP, then it's worth reaching out re: other specs like IndieAuth, Micropub etc.
[tantek]
at
2022-11-23 16:59
-
might be the time for that, and distinguishing "fediverse" from "ActivityPub"
[tantek]
at
2022-11-21 20:11
-
Seirdy, I can state that factually the different technical decisions in the Social Web WG (that produced Activity Pub) did *not* primarily come from different community models. I think you're mistaking an effect for a cause.
[tantek]
at
2022-11-21 18:33
-
e.g. "Copy and paste this URL into the reply field of your favorite Micropub app or replying interface of your IndieWeb site."
[tantek]
at
2022-11-20 01:04
-
next I think we need a protocol like webactions to handle cross-site interactions that Mastodon folks call "remote follow", without being Mastodong or ActivityPub specific
[tantek]
at
2022-11-20 00:50
-
I think a good first step would be to encourage work on test suites for the social web related specs that currently lack them, e.g. both activitypub and indieauth.
[tantek]
at
2022-11-20 00:49
-
aaronpk, both meta & dev, sorta more #indieweb-meta so replying here. re: "Should we restart meetings at the W3C social CG to try to actually improve the standard and interop?" — Evan reached out to me about what should we do with the current resurgence of indieweb/activitypub interest, while I was away. I replied with some ideas but yes there are some possibilities there.
[tantek]
at
2022-11-20 00:49
-
I believe such actions must not be hardcoded for Mastodon, or ActivityPub, or Twitter for that matter, and instead should be based on an open standard that any of them could implement
[tantek]
at
2022-11-20 00:38
-
by "working more with microblog.pub" do you mean coding with it? Asking because you mentioned protocols
[tantek]1
at
2022-11-10 17:46