392 results for "microformats hard"

  • The Microformats-2 parsing spec for a property that is also a root, I find it hard not to produce both the value for the property *and* the structure for the item. But other parsers end up with only the structure for the item.
    Calli at 2015-11-28 17:48
  • Hard to tell with size of markup in that issue and title leaves room for interpretation. Maybe?
    Calli at 2015-11-25 01:18
  • extensibility is supposed to be hard, or at least harder than finding and re-using existing vocabularies
    tantek at 2015-08-26 00:02
  • tantek meant to say: frankly I actually don't care if LD people find it too hard to figure out mf2 extensibllity. the fact that they're focusing on extensibility first, and shipping things with *widely accepted existing vocabs* second, means they're doomed to fail anyway
    Loqi at 2015-08-25 23:56
  • frankly I actually don't care if LD people find it too hard to figure out mf2 extensibllity. the fact that they're focusing on extensibility first, and shipping things second, means they're doomed to fail anyway
    tantek at 2015-08-25 23:55
  • aaronpk - funny thing, that rule, about having to provide a link to *research* into that object/property, hey, that's part of the microformats process that they complain about as being "too hard"
    tantek at 2015-08-25 23:51
  • schema.org is hard to understand for most parts
    iSRAELiT at 2015-08-02 12:16
  • but I have to say getting started was a bit hard
    ePirat at 2015-07-30 18:32
  • cosuming microformats is hard!
    KartikPrabhu at 2015-07-18 03:49
  • not sure where you're seeing the sarcasm there. normally i have to work pretty hard for my typed text to be read as sarcastic
    aaronpk at 2015-07-02 19:30
Sort by:

Filter results by:

Tag

Query took 0s.


Search tips

Exclusion
+foo -bar
Logical OR
foo OR bar
Exact phrase
"foo bar"
Partial words
foo*
Particular fields only
title:foo
domain:example.org
nick:somebody
after:2016-11-23
before:2016-11-23
date:2016-11-23