362
results for "nofollow"
-
the vouching URL would probably be one that doesn't accept user input, and I think it makes sense to ignore any links with eg. rel-nofollow on them
voxpelli
at
2016-08-14 15:48
-
aaronpk: do you insert something like nofollow?
voxpelli
at
2016-07-28 19:26
-
<dt class="comment-author " id="c8602367063649488172"> <a name="c8602367063649488172"></a> <div class="avatar-image-container avatar-stock"><span dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/11855510310992673801" rel="nofollow" onclick="" class="avatar-hovercard" id="av-0-11855510310992673801"><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" width="16" height="16" alt="" title="Brien Malone"> </a></span></div> <a hr
KevinMarks
at
2016-05-26 18:51
-
so rel=nofollow is doubly bad. ineffective for intended purpose, and punishes "normal" users
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:11
-
in addition, silos eventually began abusing rel=nofollow by putting it on second party content (posts on silos) instead of *just* 3rd party content (comments on posts on silos)
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:10
-
this turns out to be the fallacy of rel=nofollow
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:10
-
i still don't get why they're still spamming, rel=nofollow should've destroyed the incentive
myfreeweb
at
2016-03-20 13:08
-
indieauth.com doesn't care about the nofollow
aaronpk
at
2016-02-14 20:26
-
I speculate that rel="me nofollow" is confusing IndieAuth.
nelson
at
2016-02-14 20:25
-
less barfalicious: curl https://plus.google.com/+RussellNelson/about | grep -q 'href="http://russnelson.com/" rel="me nofollow"' && echo "found it"
nelson
at
2016-02-14 20:21