364
results for "nofollow"
-
yeah because I think the current protocols are not that far from something really cool, we just need to piece it all together, and make everything very explicit (like this nofollow thing for instance which should be a big warning sign :D)
cmal
at
2016-09-13 02:50
-
i tag them all rel=nofollow
ben_thatmustbeme
at
2016-09-13 02:47
-
the vouching URL would probably be one that doesn't accept user input, and I think it makes sense to ignore any links with eg. rel-nofollow on them
voxpelli
at
2016-08-14 15:48
-
aaronpk: do you insert something like nofollow?
voxpelli
at
2016-07-28 19:26
-
<dt class="comment-author " id="c8602367063649488172"> <a name="c8602367063649488172"></a> <div class="avatar-image-container avatar-stock"><span dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.blogger.com/profile/11855510310992673801" rel="nofollow" onclick="" class="avatar-hovercard" id="av-0-11855510310992673801"><img src="//img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" width="16" height="16" alt="" title="Brien Malone"> </a></span></div> <a hr
KevinMarks
at
2016-05-26 18:51
-
so rel=nofollow is doubly bad. ineffective for intended purpose, and punishes "normal" users
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:11
-
in addition, silos eventually began abusing rel=nofollow by putting it on second party content (posts on silos) instead of *just* 3rd party content (comments on posts on silos)
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:10
-
this turns out to be the fallacy of rel=nofollow
tantek
at
2016-03-20 13:10
-
i still don't get why they're still spamming, rel=nofollow should've destroyed the incentive
myfreeweb
at
2016-03-20 13:08
-
indieauth.com doesn't care about the nofollow
aaronpk
at
2016-02-14 20:26