1246
results for "*pub nick:tantek"
-
sparkles++ https://www.benji.dog/articles/sparkles/ if your server supports Micropub, check out this very nice looking new client from [benji] that supports quite a variety of post types
[tantek]
at
2022-12-30 08:22
-
barnaby, snarfed, if you want to document the specific concepts/APIs/tech in ActivityWeb or ActivityPush that look very much like direct predecessors to ActivityPub features, please free to add that (even just as prose) to /ActivityWeb and I’m happy to wiki-garden it
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 22:32
-
[snarfed] I'd be curious of your opinion of https://github.com/converspace/activitypush-specification (it's a very short read) and if it even vaguely resembles (either conceptually or actually) how ActivityPub works
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 21:59
-
fascinating, ActivityPush (2012 era) sounds A LOT like a predecessor to ActivityPub, and even uses JSON-based API as well.
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 21:57
-
also demonstrate working with a domain that had IndieAuth but no Micropub server support
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 19:33
-
barnaby, man many years ago at IWS a bunch of us, myself, aaronpk, a few others, joked about a minimal (demo) Micropub client that literally allowed you one of everything. one post, one like, one following
[tantek]
at
2022-12-29 19:30
-
micropub to your site to twitter is not "micropub to silos". your site fully owns the responsibility there and that has nothing to do with micropub IMO
[tantek]
at
2022-12-21 19:31
-
agreed that Micropub to silos can be lossy, however, I believe that is the responsibility of the Micropub client to clearly communicate to the user (the limitations of the "server" (silo) that they are posting to
[tantek]
at
2022-12-21 19:24
-
whereas with Micropub, the receiving server is very much expected to treat the client request with precise fidelity
[tantek]
at
2022-12-21 19:19
-
Micropub is a higher-fidelity more explicit protocol so that makes sense
[tantek]
at
2022-12-21 19:17